Cato Supreme Court Review: 2004–2005

About the Book

In this annual review from the Cato Institute, Mark K. Moller and leading legal scholars analyze the 2004–2005 Supreme Court term, specifically the most important and far‐​reaching cases of the year. Timely and easy to read, the Cato Supreme Court Review critiques the Court’s decisions from a unique Madisonian perspective.

About the Editor

Mark Moller is a senior fellow in constitutional studies. An experienced appellate lawyer, Moller previously practiced law with the Appellate and Constitutional Law Practice Group at the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. During private practice, he engaged in a number of high‐​profile representations, including as a member of the team that successfully litigated Bush v. Gore before the Supreme Court and as an advisor to judicial nominee Miguel A. Estrada during his Senate confirmation hearings.

What Others Have Said

“Cato, with its emphasis on limited government and individual rights, has weighed in with a book of essays by academics and practicing lawyers that manages to skewer liberal and conservative justices alike.”

—Tony Mauro, Supreme Court Correspondent, Legal Times

“In view of so many Americans’ alarming lack of knowledge of why we are Americans, the Cato Supreme Court Review is essential reading.”

—Nat Hentoff, Syndicated Columnist, Village Voice