May 19, 2014 3:36PM # Washington Steers Investment Astray By [Chris Edwards](https://www.cato.org/people/chris-edwards) --- SHARE [Experience shows](http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/blog?field_themes_tid=All&field_departments_target_id=5&=Apply) that green business subsidies are a green light for misallocation and inefficiency. Subsidy programs seem to prompt company leaders to think: - “Washington experts say this is a good idea. Let’s do it!” - “Yeehaw, we’re getting free money. Let’s blow the bank!” Those sorts of thoughts seem to have steered Southern Company into building a very expressive boondoggle project in Mississippi. The clean coal plant is to include a complex carbon capture system with a 62-mile pipeline. The [*Washington Post* reports](http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/intended-showcase-of-clean-coal-future-hits-snags/2014/05/16/fc03e326-cfd2-11e3-b812-0c92213941f4_story.html): > The only thing the Kemper power plant is burning now is money. The plant has suffered almost every kind of cost overrun, beset by bad weather, labor costs, shortages and “inconsistent” quality of equipment and materials, and contractor and supplier delays. Southern said in April that it was raising the projected cost of the plant by $235 million, to a total of $5.5 billion, more than double the original estimate. So the Kemper plant yielded to [Edwards’ Law of cost overruns](http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/edwards-law-government-cost-overruns). When the government subsidizes large and complex projects, costs tend to double. The Southern plant “received a $270 million grant from the Energy Department and $133 million of federal investment tax credits — though by blowing a deadline, Southern will lose some tax benefits.” The *Post* story mentions another company that was led astray by the pied piper of green subsidies: > The electric utility AEP, one of the largest U.S. emitters of greenhouse gases, built a pilot plant (half financed by the Energy Department) for capturing and burying CO2 from its Mountaineer plant in New Haven, W.Va. But the project was abandoned because it was too expensive. There is one more failure mentioned by the *Post*: “… for years a proposed carbon capture and storage consortium called [FutureGen](http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/energy/energy-subsidies#10), backed in part by federal funds, has failed to get off the ground.” These projects indicate that when considering the waste caused by business subsidies, you cannot just tally up the federal cash out of the door. You also need to consider the private money following the government money as it is flushed down the drain. ##### Related Tags [Tax and Budget Policy](https://www.cato.org/tax-budget-policy) [![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).