March 12, 2018 6:50PM # The War on Opioids Has Become a War on Patients By [Jeffrey A. Singer](https://www.cato.org/people/jeffrey-singer) --- SHARE As Anne Fuqua recently [pointed out](https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/the-other-opioid-crisis-pain-patients-who-cant-access-the-medicine-they-need/2018/03/09/5ad83b24-2301-11e8-badd-7c9f29a55815_story.html?utm_term=.490e7863fcbd) in the Washington Post, non-medical drug users accessing heroin and fentanyl in the underground drug market are not the only victims in the opioid crisis. Many patients for whom prescriptions opioids are the only relief from a life sentence of torturing pain are also victims. That is because policymakers continue to base their strategies on the misguided and simplistic notion that the opioid overdose crisis impacting the US, [Canada](https://globalnews.ca/news/3922860/canada-over-4k-opioid-fentanyl-deaths-2017-advisory-committee/), and [Europe](http://www.ajpb.com/news/opioid-epidemic-ravages-europe), is tied to doctors prescribing opioids to their patients in pain. Unfortunately, political leaders and the media operate in an echo chamber, reinforcing the notion that cutting back on doctors prescribing opioids is the key to reducing overdose deaths. As a result, all 50 states operate Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs that track the prescribing habits of doctors and intimidate them into curtailing the prescription of opioids. Yet [multiple](http://www.ajmc.com/journals/issue/2017/2017-vol23-n5/state-prescription-drug-monitoring-programs-and-fatal-drug-overdoses) [studies](http://www.krannert.purdue.edu/programs/phd/Working-papers-series/2017/1292-Justine-Mallatt-Prescription-Drug-Monitoring.pdf) suggest that PDMPs have no effect on the opioid overdose rate and may be contributing to its increase by [driving](https://www.thedailybeast.com/feds-pill-crackdown-drives-pain-patients-to-heroin) desperate pain patients to the dangers that await them in the black market. Last month Arizona joined the list of 24 states that had put in place limits on the amount and dosage of opioids doctors may prescribe acute and postoperative pain patients. These actions are based on the amateur [misinterpretation](https://www.cato.org/blog/politicians-cannot-stop-punishing-patients-unintended-consequences-drug-prohibition) of the 2016 opioid guidelines put out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and are not evidence-based. And the Food and Drug Administration continues to promote the replacement of prescription opioids with abuse-deterrent formulations, despite an [abundance of evidence](https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/abuse-deterrent-opioids-law-unintended-consequences) showing this policy only serves to drive non-medical users to heroin and fentanyl while raising health care costs to health systems and patients. As prescriptions continue to decrease, overdose deaths continue to [increase](https://www.cato.org/blog/stop-calling-it-opioid-crisis-its-heroin-fentanyl-crisis). This is because as non-medical users get reduced access to usable diverted prescription opioids, they migrate to more dangerous fentanyl and heroin. It is simplistic—and thus provides an easy target—for politicians and the media to latch on to the false narrative that greedy pharmaceutical companies teamed up with lazy, poorly-trained doctors, to hook innocent patients on opioids and condemn them to a life of drug addiction. But this has never been the case. As Patrick Michaels pointed [out](https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/dea-crackdown-s-going-hurt-those-pain) about recrudescent opiophobia back in 2004, prescription opioids actually have a low addictive potential and when taken by patients under the guidance of a physician, have a very low overdose potential. Cochrane systematic studies in [2010](http://www.cochrane.org/CD006605/SYMPT_opioids-long-term-treatment-noncancer-pain) and [2012](http://thblack.com/links/rsd/Addiction2012_publ_online_Oct18_DevDependafterTxwOpioids4PainReliefREV.pdf) both found an addiction rate of roughly 1 percent in chronic non-cancer pain patients. And a January 2018 [study in *BMJ*](http://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.j5790.long) by researchers at Harvard and Johns Hopkins examined 568,000 opioid naïve patients prescribed opioids for acute and postoperative pain from 2008 to 2016 and found a total “misuse” rate (all “misuse” diagnostic codes) of just 0.6 percent. And researchers at the University of North Carolina [reported](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26333030) in 2016 on 2.2 million residents of the state who were prescribed opioids, where they found an overdose rate of 0.022 percent. Until policymakers disabuse themselves of the false notion that the opioid overdose crisis is a direct result of doctors prescribing opioids to patients in pain, the opioid overdose rate will continue to climb—only the type of opioid from which victims are overdosing will change. We have already seen it move from diverted OxyContin and other prescription opioids to heroin, and from heroin to heroin plus fentanyl. Most recently, fentanyl was the[ predominant](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/09/02/upshot/fentanyl-drug-overdose-deaths.html) cause of overdoses. The “war on opioids” being waged by today’s policymakers is, in effect, a “war on patients in pain.” If policymakers are serious about wanting to reduce overdose deaths, they should look to what has been done in [Portugal](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/22/opinion/sunday/portugal-drug-decriminalization.html), and now [Norway](http://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/norway-parliament-drugs-decriminalise-recreational-cocaine-heroin-marijuana-a8111761.html), and end the war on drugs. If they can’t muster the political will to go that far, then they should at least put the focus on [harm reduction](http://harmreduction.org/about-us/principles-of-harm-reduction/) measures, such as syringe services programs, medication-assisted treatment, and making the overdose antidote naloxone available over-the-counter. Instead of a war on opioids, they should wage a war on deaths. ##### Related Tags [Health Care](https://www.cato.org/health-care) [![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).