November 19, 2012 12:48PM 

# Taking Education Policy from Quackery to Science 

By [Andrew J. Coulson](https://www.cato.org/people/andrew-coulson) 

---

<a class="js-popover-trigger cursor-pointer popover-trigger" data-bs-placement="bottom" data-bs-trigger="click" id="popover-trigger"> 

SHARE 

</a> 

I recently bewailed the peddling of [education policy snake-oil](https://www.cato.org/would-you-let-a-quack-treat-your-child/) — advocacy based on non-sequiturs and false/​misleading/​incomplete data. At the end of it, I teased a forthcoming piece suggesting how the field could be kicked up a notch in seriousness and value. It ran today on the *Washington Post’s* [Answer Sheet](http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2012/11/19/why-some-conservatives-oppose-vouchers/) blog.

Feel free to ping me on [Twitter ](https://twitter.com/Andrew_Coulson)or [Facebook ](http://www.facebook.com/andrew.j.coulson)if you have comments.

##### Related Tags 

[Education](https://www.cato.org/education), [General](https://www.cato.org/general), [Government and Politics](https://www.cato.org/government-politics), [Center for Educational Freedom](https://www.cato.org/center-educational-freedom) 

[![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 
This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).