There are two ways to become an illegal immigrant in the United States. The first is to enter illegally, usually across the Southwest border. Those folks are sometimes called EWIs, short for entered without inspection. The second way to become an illegal immigrant is to enter legally and then lose legal status, often by overstaying a temporary visa.
The majority of new illegal immigrants were EWIs until recently. A recent paper by Robert Warren and Donald Kerwin at the Center for Migration Studies found that overstays accounted for 58 percent of new illegal immigrants in 2012, a rapid increase over the course of a decade (Chart 1).
Overstays as a Percent of all Illegal Entries
Source: Warren and Kerwin.
At an immigration hearing last week, several witnesses emphasized that continued illegal immigrant entries along the Southwest border and a rising percentage of overstays mean that America’s immigration system is insecure. In contrast, the higher overstay rate is evidence of fewer illegal immigrants crossing the border as EWIs.
In calculating the percent of new illegal immigrants who are overstays, the number of EWIs is in the denominator added to the number of overstays. The number of overstays is the numerator. The falling number of illegal immigrants crossing the Southwest border without inspection shrinks the denominator on its own, thus boosting the overstay rate. The surge in the overstay rate is not a lack of security at points of entry and exit but caused by a yuuuuge fall in illegal immigrants crossing the border.
As evidence for that, I kept Warren and Kerwin’s estimates of the overstay population unchanged but held constant at 2000 levels the number of illegal immigrants entering without inspection. In other words, I didn’t change the flows in the overstay population but just froze the number of illegal immigrants entering without inspection at the higher 2000 number. Doing that lowers the 2012 overstay rate to 24 percent – less than half of the rate it actually was and lower than at any point during the entire 30 year period in their paper.
Warren and Kerwin admit that their overstay rate results are sensitive to their estimates of EWIs and how many overstays actually stay long enough to become illegal immigrants. Small changes in those numbers can shift their findings dramatically. However, the relationship between the number of CBP apprehensions and the overstay rate supports my simple point (Chart 2). As the number of apprehensions fell because fewer immigrants attempted to enter the United States, overstays provided a greater percentage of new illegal immigrants.