December 5, 2017 2:12PM # Public Schooling Battles: November Dispatch By [Neal McCluskey](https://www.cato.org/people/neal-mccluskey) --- SHARE ![Media Name: desembarco_de_los_puritanos_en_america_antonio_gisbert.jpg](/sites/cato.org/files/styles/pubs_2x/public/social-images/desembarco_de_los_puritanos_en_america_antonio_gisbert.jpg?itok=AVgSU1J0) Last month we posted [our first “dispatch”](https://www.cato.org/blog/public-schooling-battles-october-dispatch) from the frontlines of public schooling’s values and identity-based wars, conflicts ultimately entered on the [Public Schooling Battle Map](https://www.cato.org/education-fight-map), an interactive database of such contests. The monthly dispatch is intended to lay out some of the themes we’ve observed in battles during the month, and to give you a sense over which basic values the public schools—inherently [zero-sum arenas](https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/private-schools-vs-public-schools-why-private-schools-are-better)—have people battling. Here are the themes of November: - **Discriminatory Dress Codes:** Allegations that school dress codes discriminate against girls, proscribing lots of attire options for them on the grounds that they are too revealing—and may be distracting for boys—while prohibiting far less for the guys were prevalent in November. Of course, dress code conflicts are not new—the Battle Map contains nearly 90 such fights—but it seems those fueled by accusations of gender discrimination, as opposed to, say, freedom of expression, may be growing. Conflicts in November flared up in [Oxnard](http://people.com/bodies/male-student-wears-crop-top-to-protest-high-school-dress-code/), CA; [Loyalsock Township](https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/students-dress-code-violation-cleavage-excessive-midriff-sweatshirt-222549971.html), PA; and [Washington Township](https://www.indystar.com/story/news/education/2017/11/27/how-some-say-washington-township-schools-dress-code-blames-girls-boys-bad-behavior/840061001/), IN. - **Sex Ed:** Putting at odds basic beliefs about moral behavior, health, and age appropriateness of instruction, sex education has been a war zone for decades. But it seemed to have faded at bit over the last few years, eclipsed by contests over bathroom access and other, even hotter-button issues. But it made a bit of return in November, with battles over proposed [online, parent-selected sex education](http://www.sltrib.com/news/education/2017/11/13/sex-education-could-move-out-of-the-classroom-and-onto-the-internet-under-utah-lawmakers-proposal/) in Utah; the presence of *Sex, Etc.* magazine—with articles such as “Where do you stand on Friends With Benefits?” and “The clitoris and pleasure: What you should know”—in a [New Jersey middle school](http://www.app.com/story/news/education/in-our-schools/2017/11/08/pinelands-regional-sex-education-magazine/844872001/); and a proposal in [Niagara Falls](http://www.wgrz.com/article/news/local/falls-superintendent-proposes-health-and-sex-ed-changes/490733572), NY that could involve escorting Planned Parenthood reps through schools. - **Curricula:** What public schools teach is, of course, controversial, beyond the extremely contentious subject of sex education. In November we also saw Mexican American studies—and one proposed textbook in particular—create [fireworks in Texas](https://www.texastribune.org/2017/11/08/officials-mexican-american-studies-textbook/); disagreements over the definition of “civic readiness” in [Nebraska](http://journalstar.com/news/local/education/nebraska-ed-board-considers-what-students-need-to-be-civic/article_f7b1c1ff-f9fc-57ff-be84-891a5ff37cfb.html); and a proposal in [Florida](http://www.orlandosentinel.com/features/education/school-zone/os-florida-textbooks-instructional-materials-bill-20171130-story.html) not just to let parents challenge textbooks, but propose replacements. There were lots of other conflicts—over *[The Hate U Give](https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/names/2017/12/01/the-hate-give-book-banned-texas-school-district/8C2XDJ2rGSK2jjwyajmKJK/story.html)*, [Bible study](http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2017/11/hudsonville_ends_lunchtime_bib.html), and [more](http://fox61.com/2017/11/17/school-bars-student-from-wearing-fake-news-network-shirt-on-field-trip-to-cnn/)—but these seem to be the trends. By the way, over on the [Battle Map Facebook page](https://www.facebook.com/CatoBattleMap/) we have started posting twice-weekly polls on the kinds of conflicts we see repeatedly. They are not scientific, and we are just starting to build traffic on the page, but they often suggest significant divides among, presumably, perfectly decent people. For instance, our question whether school officials or students should decide which bathrooms and locker rooms students can use saw an almost 50/50 split, with 48 percent choosing “public school officials” and 52 percent “students.” Asked whether the tenor of American history taught in public schools tends to be “too critical” or “too celebratory,” 65 percent chose the latter, but a still significant 35 percent picked the former. Now, head over to the Facebook page and vote on the active questions: Should student journalists or school administrators ultimately decide what gets published in school newspapers, and who should decide what kids read in public schools? Also, please send any values or identity-based battles you find to [nmccluskey@​cato.​org](mailto:nmccluskey@cato.org). And ask yourself: Why should we be forced to fight, or sacrifice what matters to us, in educating our children? Why shouldn’t we be [free to choose](https://www.cato.org/research/school-choice)? ##### Related Tags [Constitutional Law](https://www.cato.org/constitutional-law), [Education](https://www.cato.org/education), [General](https://www.cato.org/general), [Center for Educational Freedom](https://www.cato.org/center-educational-freedom), [Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies](https://www.cato.org/robert-levy-center-constitutional-studies) [![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).