September 9, 2009 11:52AM 

# More Sense on the President’s Speech 

By [Neal McCluskey](https://www.cato.org/people/neal-mccluskey) 

---

<a class="js-popover-trigger cursor-pointer popover-trigger" data-bs-placement="bottom" data-bs-trigger="click" id="popover-trigger"> 

SHARE 

</a> 

I’m busy dealing with the fallout from the President’s address to students yesterday, especially the [cheap-shot smearing](http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2009/09/staying_in_school_and_the_soci.html) as kooks or right-wing zealots anyone who dared question the propriety of the event. That has left me with little time to blog about the speech. Fortunately, I don’t have to: Over at Cafe Hayek, Cato Adjunct Scholar Donald Boudreaux has [penned a terrific explanation](http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/not-a-brick-in-any-wall.html) of why very reasonable people could object to the president’s speech. Here’s the best part:

> The idea that we should be ‘inspired’ by winners of political elections — the notion that successful politicians have some special wisdom to impart — the stupid consensus that high political office renders its holders unusually trustworthy when delivering clusters of cliches — is intolerable to men and women who value freedom and individuality.

##### Related Tags 

[Education](https://www.cato.org/education), [Center for Educational Freedom](https://www.cato.org/center-educational-freedom) 

[![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 
This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).