August 12, 2010 1:14PM 

# Fordham Feeds the Paranoia 

By [Neal McCluskey](https://www.cato.org/people/neal-mccluskey) 

---

<a class="js-popover-trigger cursor-pointer popover-trigger" data-bs-placement="bottom" data-bs-trigger="click" id="popover-trigger"> 

SHARE 

</a> 

You might recall several weeks back when Chester Finn, president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, [called people like me “paranoid”](https://www.cato.org/2010/06/17/unfortunately-one-mans-paranoia-is-everyone-elses-reality/) for seeing federal money driving states to adopt national education standards as cause for serious concern that (a) the feds will take over schools’ curricula, and (b) the new federal curriculum will be taken over by potent [special interests like teachers’ unions](https://www.cato.org/2010/08/10/not-just-a-special-interest-a-super-special-interest/). (You know, the kinds of special interests that can get Democrats to give them $10 billion [by cutting food stamps](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kati-haycock/cutting-food-stamps-to-sa_b_674770.html).) Well, in last week’s *Education Gadfly,* Fordham published [a piece by Eugenia Kemble](http://www.edexcellence.net/gadfly/index.cfm?issue=588&edition=N#a6307), president of the union-dedicated Albert Shanker Institute, saying that national standards demand a national curriculum.

This interesting little happening — Fordham publishing a piece by a union stalwart arguing that a national curriculum must go with national standards — [didn’t go unnoticed ](http://jaypgreene.com/2010/08/05/does-fordham-support-a-national-curriculum/)by fellow paranoiac Greg Forster, who [is now ](http://jaypgreene.com/2010/08/11/arguing-the-merits/)in a blog dispute [with Kemble](http://shankerblog.org/?p=509). It makes for telling reading, especially Kemble’s rejoinder. It features an [all-too-casual ](https://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=7040)use of the charged term “balkanization” to seemingly describe anything not centralized, and utterly fails to mention federal funding when implying that the common standards push is state led and voluntary.

Unfortunately, Kemble mainly just sidesteps Forster’s primary point: Fordham has provided yet more evidence that national standards funded by the feds will lead to a national curriculum that could very well be controlled by special interests. Heck, Fordham is in league with at least one component of the teachers’ unions here, which is fine if they share the same goals. All Forster is trying to emphasize is that it is ridiculous to call people crazy when they simply point out what so much evidence seems to show.

##### Related Tags 

[Education](https://www.cato.org/education), [General](https://www.cato.org/general), [Center for Educational Freedom](https://www.cato.org/center-educational-freedom) 

[![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 
This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).