January 19, 2017 10:32AM # Fed Ed Failure File Just Got Fatter By [Neal McCluskey](https://www.cato.org/people/neal-mccluskey) --- SHARE ![Media Name: sig-practices-630x315.jpg](/sites/cato.org/files/styles/pubs_2x/public/social-images/sig-practices-630x315.jpg?itok=7cZ7SDGF) In the aftermath of Betsy DeVos’s [confirmation hearing](https://www.cato.org/blog/indigesting-devos-confirmation-hearing)—but really, anytime someone’s talking about federal education policy—it is important to look at evidence. Today we’ve got several items to add to the evidence pile, none of them good for fed ed. The first is a [new report on the School Improvement Grants program](https://www.mathematica-mpr.com/our-publications-and-findings/projects/evaluating-race-to-the-top-and-school-improvement-grants), an initiative aimed at turning around troubled schools with various possible interventions ranging from replacing principals to closing schools. What did the report find? The [multi-billion dollar](https://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/funding.html) undertaking “had no impact on math or reading test scores, high school graduation, or college enrollment.” Next, to higher education. A *Wall Street Journal* article today reports that the U.S. Department of Education [widely overstated the repayment rate](http://www.wsj.com/articles/student-debt-payback-far-worse-than-believed-1484777880) of student loans. Indeed, when the *Journal* recalculated the numbers, “the data revealed that the Department previously had inflated the repayment rates for 99.8% of all colleges and trade schools in the country.” The problem, according to an education department spokesperson cited in the article: a programming error. Finally, we come to Navient, a company that exists largely on a contract to service student loans for the U.S. Department of Education. Yesterday the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)—itself a [big federal fiasco](https://www.cato.org/blog/yes-honor-cfpb-indeed-unconstitutional)—announced that [it was suing](http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/18/pf/college/navient-sallie-mae-sued-cfpb/) Navient for deceptive and exploitative practices it allegedly undertook to cut costs and maximize revenues. The CFPB [isn’t entirely known](http://www.seethruedu.com/updatesspeaking-unconstitutional-here-comes-cfpb/) for its own straight shooting, so Navient should get the benefit of the doubt. But it is certainly plausible that this government-privileged company takes advantage of its largely [captive clientele](https://studentaid.ed.gov/sa/repay-loans/understand/servicers#select). And who is Navient’s mother, by the way? Why none other than Sallie Mae—the company was spun off from Sallie in 2014—which was originally a government-sponsored enterprise like Fannie and Freddie, [created by Washington](https://www.salliemae.com/about/who-we-are/history/) to buy and service student loans in 1972. In her confirmation hearing, Betsy DeVos pretty consistently indicated an aversion to federal power. The evidence is on her side, and growing every day. ##### Related Tags [Education](https://www.cato.org/education), [Center for Educational Freedom](https://www.cato.org/center-educational-freedom) [![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).