May 28, 2010 3:13PM # Event Data Recorders: They’re Not Just for Safety By [Jim Harper](https://www.cato.org/people/jim-harper) --- SHARE In my [recent testimony before the House Commerce Committee](https://www.cato.org/testimony/ct-jh-05062010.html) on a proposal to require event data recorders in all new cars sold in the United States, I pointed out that the mandate would go far beyond what is needed to ensure safety. Indeed, the cost of EDRs raises the prices of new cars, marginally reducing the pool of used cars and keeping lower income drivers in older used cars which are less safe. The [demand for EDRs in all cars](https://www.cato.org/2010/05/10/claybrook-all-your-data-are-belong-to-u-s/), collecting and transmitting data about all crashes, suggests that something more than statistically relevant safety data is what advocates of this mandate want. I put a finer point on these issues today in [answers to questions](https://www.cato.org/wp-content/uploads/Harper-Responses-to-Barton-Questions.pdf) propounded to me after the hearing. The proposed EDR mandate includes controls on the use of EDR information, a nominal protection for privacy, but the EDR mandate “sets the stage for migration away from consumer privacy toward serving the goals of government and industry related not only to safety but also to general law enforcement, taxation, and surveillance.” ##### Related Tags [Technology and Privacy](https://www.cato.org/technology-privacy) [![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).