October 12, 2010 2:40PM 

# Cut (Really Cut) Military Spending 

By [Christopher A. Preble](https://www.cato.org/people/christopher-preble) 

---

<a class="js-popover-trigger cursor-pointer popover-trigger" data-bs-placement="bottom" data-bs-trigger="click" id="popover-trigger"> 

SHARE 

</a> 

Today *For​eign​Pol​i​cy​.com* has a feature article examining possible [“Plan B’s for Obama,”](http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/10/11/a_plan_b_for_obama?page=0,8) with contributions coming from numerous experts. My contribution to the feature is titled [“Cut (Really Cut) Military Spending.”](http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/10/11/a_plan_b_for_obama?page=0,8)

It is time for President Obama and the administration to finally notice [the](http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf) [increasing](http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2010/1007/Want-to-improve-US-national-security-Cut-the-defense-budget) [calls](http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/42438.html)—from across the political spectrum—that [the Pentagon’s budget should not be off limits](https://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=12151) when reducing the deficit. From the *Foreign Policy* article:

> Despite all the hype about Defense Secretary Robert Gates and his cuts of big-ticket military projects, the Pentagon’s $680 billion budget is actually slated to increase in coming years. This is unconscionable at a time when taxpayers are under enormous stress and when the U.S. government must reduce spending across the board. Barack Obama can save big bucks without undermining U.S. security — but only if he refocuses the military on a few, core missions.
> 
> 
> …
> 
> 
> The hawks will scream, but America will be just fine. Obama can capitalize on the country’s unique advantages — wide oceans to the east and west, friendly neighbors to the north and south, a dearth of powerful enemies globally, and the wealth to adapt to dangers as they arise — by adopting a grand strategy of restraint. The United States could shed the burden of defending other countries that are able to defend themselves, abandon futile efforts to fix failed states, and focus on those security challenges that pose the greatest threat to America. A strategic shift of this magnitude will not only reduce conflict and make the United States safer, but it will enable Obama to reshape the military to suit this more modest set of objectives, at a price that’s far easier for taxpayers to swallow.

Click [here](http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/10/11/a_plan_b_for_obama?page=0,8) to read the full article

##### Related Tags 

[Defense and Foreign Policy](https://www.cato.org/defense-foreign-policy) 

[![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 
This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).