October 5, 2007 10:15AM # Correction to Yesterday’s Post, (Lies, Damn Lies,…) By [Daniel J. Ikenson](https://www.cato.org/people/daniel-j-ikenson) --- SHARE Yesterday on this blog, I [posted](https://www.cato.org/2007/10/04/lies-damn-lies-statistics-and-a-media-happy-to-abuse-them/) my criticisms of a *WSJ*/NBC poll and a *WSJ* article that was based on that poll. Although I firmly stand by my central criticism that there was a clear bias in the phraseology of Question 10 that was completely unnecessary, I made a factual error in my post that I wish to correct. In paragraph four, I assert (about the poll) that “no questions were asked about whether the respondents would agree with a Republican candidate who favors tougher regulations to limit foreign imports.” But it was subsequently brought to my attention that such a question was asked at question 7.7 of the poll. I stand corrected. Had I not overlooked that question, I would not have criticized the author for reporting a “phantom result.” I apologize to John Harwood for the assertions and implications related to that point. With the exception of the second and third sentences of paragraph four, the entire blog post, with the same tone and same conclusions, remains valid. ##### Related Tags [Trade Policy](https://www.cato.org/trade-policy), [Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies](https://www.cato.org/herbert-stiefel-center-trade-policy-studies) [![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).