I should have posted this earlier, but if anyone interested in legal issues -- should be everyone given that most things coming out of Washington these days have constitutional defects -- hasn't yet read Damon Root's cover story in the July issue of Reason magazine, drop what you're doing now and do so.
While not a J.D. -- or perhaps because he isn't -- Damon paints a completely accurate picture on the differences between conservative and libertarian approaches to constitutional interpretation and judicial philosophy. And I don't mean a rehash of debates on social issues except in legalese; there are real subtleties involved, particularly when most people adhering to either of these camps call themselves "originalists" of one stripe or another. Damon's article is both deep and wide, surveying the landscape of relevant legal thinkers and explaining to non-lawyers why all this is so, so important. (And no, I personally am not featured.)
What is more, you can now also watch Damon discussing his article and reporting in this area:
This is groundbreaking and important journalism.