

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Robert A. Levy (Author at The Cato Institute)</title>
<atom:link href="http://www.cato.org/rss/author.xml?auth_id=225/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://www.cato.org/people/robert-levy</link>
<managingEditor>amast@cato.org (Andrew Mast)</managingEditor>
<description>
The Cato Institute seeks to broaden the parameters of public policy debate to allow consideration of the traditional American principles of limited government, individual liberty, free markets and peace. Toward that goal, the Institute strives to achieve greater involvement of the intelligent, concerned lay public in questions of policy and the proper role of government.
</description>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
				<title>Marriage Equality: Protect or Promote? (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=13611</link>
				<description><![CDATA[Read article one.The following piece was written for SCOTUSBlog's same-sex marriage symposium.

Contrasting Lawrence v. Texas with Perry, Brian Raum contends in his post ("If you can't beat 'em, join 'em") that "the central holding in Lawrence is perfectly reasonable because the law need not promo...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=13611</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Marriage Equality: Religious Freedom, Federalism, and Judicial Activism (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=13581</link>
				<description><![CDATA[The following piece was written for SCOTUSBlog's same-sex marriage symposium.

Rather than discuss specific legal questions raised by Perry and Windsor &#8212; on which other participants will no doubt write at length &#8212; I'd like to comment briefly on three jurisprudential issues that are cen...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=13581</guid>
			</item>
			
</channel>
</rss>


