

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Neal McCluskey (Author at The Cato Institute)</title>
<atom:link href="http://www.cato.org/rss/author.xml?auth_id=562/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://www.cato.org/people/neal-mccluskey</link>
<managingEditor>amast@cato.org (Andrew Mast)</managingEditor>
<description>
The Cato Institute seeks to broaden the parameters of public policy debate to allow consideration of the traditional American principles of limited government, individual liberty, free markets and peace. Toward that goal, the Institute strives to achieve greater involvement of the intelligent, concerned lay public in questions of policy and the proper role of government.
</description>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
			<title>National Standards Mean Federal Control (Daily Podcast)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=928</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=928</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
				<title>Keep Steering Clear of National Standards (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10292</link>
				<description><![CDATA[Touting national standards is the cool thing to do in education right now, and with almost all of the nation's governors recently joining an effort to draft common standards, the fad has taken a much-publicized step toward legitimacy. But just as he did with the so-called stimulus, South Carolina Go...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10292</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Genuine Change Won't Come this Way (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10210</link>
				<description><![CDATA[If you "genuinely" intend to fix a problem you probably want to know its true causes, right? Not so Vice President Joe Biden, or at least his Middle Class Task Force, which recently released a report on college affordability that essentially ignored possibly the biggest of all tuition inflators: eve...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10210</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>In Education, 100 Days of Rhetoric and Not a Minute of Real Reform (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10160</link>
				<description><![CDATA[If you look just at dollar signs or rhetoric to measure the education success of Barack Obama's first one-hundred days, then the President should get an A. Base it on meaningful reform, however, and he'd be lucky to get a passing grade.

 Obama's overwhelming education focus has been on getting ro...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10160</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
			<title>First 100 Days:  On Education, "A" for Effort, "D" for Real Reform (Scholar Comments)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=209#blurb237</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you look just at dollar signs or rhetoric to measure the education success of Barack Obama's first one-hundred days, then the President should get an A. Base it on meaningful reform, however, and he'd be lucky to get a passing grade.</p> 

<p>Obama's overwhelming education focus has been getting roughly $100 billion directed to education through the American Recover and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). But spending billions upon billions to save jobs in a system that's seen huge staffing increases, skyrocketing per-pupil expenditures, but achievement stagnation is not forcing reform -- it's rewarding failure. And sure, the President and his Secretary of Education have talked a lot about connecting accountability to all that cash, but rhetoric rarely turns into real reform, especially once the money's out the door.</p> 

<p>Thankfully, there is a way to change the system that works: Instead of giving tax dollars to public schools, let parents control the cash. Enable parents to choose schools, and force schools to respond to them. Unfortunately, in one of the most troubling episodes of Obama's first 100 days, his administration helped usher along the death of the D.C. school choice program, burying evidence of vouchers' success in the Capital just as Congress was debating their fate, and barring 200 kids from using vouchers next year.</p>  

<p>It didn't make sense to me to put more students in the program,' explained Secretary Duncan.</p> 

<p>But here's what really doesn't make sense: spending unprecedented billions to save a hopeless system, while letting real reform die. Unfortunately, such has been Obama's first 100 days.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=209#blurb237</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NAEP Report Shows More Spending Not Translating to More Learning (Scholar Comments)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=205#blurb230</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It's nice to see increases in academic outcomes for American students, but the upticks in the latest NAEP report are once again tiny, and high school seniors &#8211; our system's final products &#8211; remain mired in stagnation. Considering the huge spending increases we've see in education over the last several decades, that's simply unacceptable.</p> 
 
<p>Unfortunately, many people are likely to grab onto the little gains on the latest NAEP and declare gigantic, top-down reforms like the completely irrational No Child Left Behind Act a triumph. Were a notion like that to become accepted wisdom, it would turn this report into an utter disaster. For one thing, given all the factors that affect student achievement, it is impossible to give credit to any single reform. Much more importantly, if these scores suggest anything, it is that all our grand five and ten-year reform plans have been almost complete failures, like we've been buying more and more bushels of oranges for decades and getting just a thimbleful of extra juice. Quite simply, we've been lavishing huge amounts of money on a government monopoly inherently incapable of meaningful improvement. If we ever want better than that, we must completely change the structure of American education, leaving behind our Soviet-style system and replacing it with a vibrant market like we have for computers, grocery stores, courier services, and almost every other good and service we take for granted every day. We need universal school choice, and we need it now.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=205#blurb230</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Killing D.C. Vouchers Softly (Daily Podcast)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=877</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=877</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
				<title>Let's Not Play Standards Roulette (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10055</link>
				<description><![CDATA[Whether it's blind hope that Washington can fix anything, a lack of ideas for reforming our crummy schools, or some other reason entirely, calls for national academic standards are increasingly loud and frequent. And while President Barack Obama stopped short of explicitly advocating for them in his...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10055</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Obama on Education: Change or Politics as Usual (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10056</link>
				<description><![CDATA[President Obama is famously tough to pin down on a lot of issues. So how much of what he said in his widely praised education address a few days ago can we believe heralds true change, and how much was really just savvy politics?

Obama opened his speech with a surefire political winner, promoting...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10056</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
			<title>Cato Scholar Comments on Obama's Higher Ed Plan (Scholar Comments)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=191#blurb214</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The higher education elements of President Obama's spending plan will no doubt be widely applauded because of the public's perception of spiraling tuition costs.  What students and parents need to understand, however, is that tuition costs spiral as a direct result of government's willingness to subsidize them with taxpayer dollars.</p>

<p>If the budget outline released by the U.S. Department of Education is what ends up getting passed, we can say goodbye forever to what little rationality remains in college pricing. The main constraint on college prices is the ability of students to pay, and while generous federal aid has enabled students to fork out a ton, prices have been somewhat constrained by Pell Grant amounts subject to the annual budget process and private &#8211; if federally subsidized &#8211; loans.</p>

<p>President Obama would get rid of even these mild constraints, ensuring that nothing stands between greedy colleges and every taxpayer dollar they can find. </p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=191#blurb214</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cato Scholars Comment on Obama's Budget (Scholar Comments)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=189#blurb212</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The higher education elements of President Obama&#8217;s spending plan will no doubt be widely applauded because of the public&#8217;s perception of spiraling tuition costs.  What students and parents need to understand, however, is that tuition costs spiral as a direct result of government&#8217;s willingness to subsidize them with taxpayer dollars.</p>
<p>If the budget outline released by the U.S. Department of Education is what ends up getting passed, we can say goodbye forever to what little rationality remains in college pricing. The main constraint on college prices is the ability of students to pay, and while generous federal aid has enabled students to fork out a ton, prices have been somewhat constrained by Pell Grant amounts subject to the annual budget process and private &#8211; if federally subsidized &#8211; loans. President Obama would get rid of even these mild constraints, ensuring that nothing stands between greedy colleges and every taxpayer dollar they can find.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=189#blurb212</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cato Scholars Comment on President Obama's Speech to Congress (Scholar Comments)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=188#blurb206</link>
			<description><![CDATA[While all these things sound terrific -- who can be against more education? -- the reality is that the more government gets involved, the worse education gets. When government runs pre-k, elementary and secondary education, it just builds more special-interest power and bureaucratic intransigence and wastes more taxpayer money. When it provides more aid to college students it just encourages more people to consume education that they often do not need, and enables colleges to raise prices with impunity. In other words, it has very much the opposite effect of what's promised, making a good education harder to get, and making it a more expensive burden for everyone.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=188#blurb206</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
				<title>A Gift for Everyone on Darwin's Birthday (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9975</link>
				<description><![CDATA[Thursday is the 200th birthday of Charles Darwin, the British naturalist whose theory of evolution has been at the center of American public school wars for almost a century. But Darwin's not to blame for all the fighting—it's the backward system that governs our public schools. 

The granddaddy o...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9975</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
			<title>Cato Scholar Comments on Charles Darwin's 200th Birthday (Scholar Comments)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=184#blurb202</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It often seems that the biggest beast to have evolved through the Theory of Evolution, credited to the man whose 200th birthday we will mark on Thursday, is warring in our public schools. Starting with the Scopes "Monkey Trial" and heading straight through the modern day, Americans have repeatedly been at each others' throats over its teaching in the public schools.  But don't blame Charles Darwin &#8211; or his detractors &#8211; for the seemingly perpetual conflict. Blame our one-size-fits-all public school system that forces families holding countless beliefs and values to support a single, official system of education. It's a perfect mechanism for inciting conflict not just over something as sensitive and disputed as human origins, but countless flashpoints including student speech rights, history curricula, sex education, and the list goes on.</p>

<p>What's the solution to this problem? School choice. Ensure that all children can access education, but let individual parents and autonomous schools determine what will be taught and how it will be done. Compel no one to support education they object and let everyone mark Darwin's birthday in peace.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=184#blurb202</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Big Ed Gropes for Stimulus (Daily Podcast)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=829</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=829</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
				<title>Investing in What Doesn't Work (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9939</link>
				<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama, in discussing the $800 + billion economic stimulus package now working its way through Congress, promised that "we will invest in what works." Well, if that's true, every piece of education spending-- totaling a whopping $150 billion-- in the mammoth stimulus bill should fall...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9939</guid>
			</item>
			
</channel>
</rss>

