

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Justin Logan (Author at The Cato Institute)</title>
<atom:link href="http://www.cato.org/rss/author.xml?auth_id=770/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://www.cato.org/people/justin-logan</link>
<managingEditor>amast@cato.org (Andrew Mast)</managingEditor>
<description>
The Cato Institute seeks to broaden the parameters of public policy debate to allow consideration of the traditional American principles of limited government, individual liberty, free markets and peace. Toward that goal, the Institute strives to achieve greater involvement of the intelligent, concerned lay public in questions of policy and the proper role of government.
</description>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
				<title>America's Alliances Are Costly Relics (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10954</link>
				<description><![CDATA[Over the past 60 years, the United States has accumulated a remarkable number of alliances. Today, nearly all of Europe, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Australia and a range of other nations peer out at the world from behind America's skirts. America's allies bring a multitude of liabilities and few as...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10954</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
			<title>Congress Hurting Diplomatic Progress with Iran (Scholar Comments)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=301#blurb346</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Congress seems determined to diminish the already low chances of a diplomatic solution to Iran's nuclear program.</p>

<p>In addition to pushing forward with unilateral sanctions on Iran, Congress has now drawn up a bill stating that Washington "is wholly capable, willing, and ready to use military force to prevent Iran from obtaining or developing a nuclear weapons capability" and calling on the Pentagon to provide Congress with a sketch of available military options against Iran.</p> 

<p>This bill will do two things: diminish the prospect of a diplomatic resolution to the problem, and burnish its supporters' nationalist credentials in the upcoming 2010 election. Unfortunately, Congress appears more interested in using the Iran issue as a domestic political football than it does in providing assistance to the Obama administration.</p>

<p>The Islamic Republic is a poor, weak country that lives in a rough neighborhood, has terrible relations with the world's largest power, and recently suffered heavy blows to its legitimacy. These are the realities that underlie Iranian diplomacy on the nuclear issue. Skittishness and erratic behavior is to be expected. The best way to help the process forward would be to keep the political temperature low, which could help lower Iran's threat perception and make it more receptive to diplomatic solutions.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=301#blurb346</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
				<title>Nuclear Diplomacy with Iran: A Skeptic's View (Nuclear Proliferation Update)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10697</link>
				<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10697</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
			<title>Known Unknowns, Iran and Nukes (Daily Podcast)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=993</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=993</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Our Troubling Unipolar World (Daily Podcast)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=951</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=951</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Obama Won't Make Much Progress in Russia (Scholar Comments)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=247#blurb285</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Successive U.S. administrations have tried to make Russia both more liberal and more at peace with advancing U.S. politico-military influence. They have failed on both fronts, in large part because the two goals conflict. Russia is less liberal and more opposed to U.S. primacy today than it was at the end of the Cold War.</p>

<p>In the advent of his trip there, President Obama issued his thoughts on various domestic political matters in Russia. Meanwhile, his Russia adviser Michael McFaul issued a statement making clear that on the two most important issues to Russia, NATO expansion and missile defense in Central Europe, "we're not going to reassure or give or trade anything with the Russians." Reassuring and giving and trading is the nature of diplomacy. Given that reality, one wonders what the administration really hopes to achieve.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=247#blurb285</guid>
		</item>
		
</channel>
</rss>

