

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Gerald P. O'Driscoll Jr. (Author at The Cato Institute)</title>
<atom:link href="http://www.cato.org/rss/author.xml?auth_id=126/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://www.cato.org/people/gerald-odriscoll</link>
<managingEditor>amast@cato.org (Andrew Mast)</managingEditor>
<description>
The Cato Institute seeks to broaden the parameters of public policy debate to allow consideration of the traditional American principles of limited government, individual liberty, free markets and peace. Toward that goal, the Institute strives to achieve greater involvement of the intelligent, concerned lay public in questions of policy and the proper role of government.
</description>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
			<title>Tarred by TARP (Scholar Comments)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=202#blurb227</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Government-backed equity was offered to adequately capitalized banks in order to remove the "stigma" from banks receiving TARP funds, and the management of these institutions took the bait and accepted the money.  Surprise, surprise: now they discover that the money came with strings.</p>

 

<p>Some banks want to pay back the TARP money to extricate themselves from government restrictions on compensation and pressure to make loans the banks view as unprofitable.  Treasury Secretary Geithner has made it clear that the decision to pay back the funds early won't be left to the banks, but to Treasury: "My basic obligation is to make sure the system as a whole &#8230; has the ability to provide the credit that recovery requires.</p>

 

<p>The banking system has thus become a tool for the government to further its policies.  And the bankers themselves put their institutions in that position.  While taxpayers may understandably feel the bankers got their comeuppance, there are at least two major problems with the Bush/Obama policy.</p>

 

<p>First, Mr. Geithner has misdiagnosed the problem.  We are in recovery from the effects of the bursting of a massive housing and finance bubble funded by debt.  That boom in turn financed a consumption binge of monumental proportions.  The only resolution of a spending binge is restraint in the form of saving.  Recovery requires not more credit and another boom, but a dose of economic sobriety.  Individuals and firms know that and are de-leveraging &#8211; unwinding what they now realize is excessive debt.  That will take the rest of this year and the better part of 2010.  Overall, credit is down because demand is down.</p>

 

<p>Second, and even more disturbing: it appears that the Obama administration wants to control the financial sector in order to gain control over what Lenin called the "Commanding Heights" of the U.S. economy: the major industries and sources of employment.  The auto industry is a prime example, and one in which the administration has involved itself directly.  It is also pressuring major recipients of TARP funds to ease the terms of the loans they have made to firms such as Chrysler. Treasury is attempting to use the banks to conduct fiscal policy through credit allocation.</p>


<p>The bankers taking TARP funds got their firms into a mess and deserve no sympathy.  Anyone believing in free markets, however, must oppose this power grab by the Obama administration.  Let the banks pay the funds back and let it be a lesson for CEOs and their stockholders: If you take government funds, you have taken on an unreliable business partner.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=202#blurb227</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
				<title>Did the Fed Cause the Housing Bubble? (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10074</link>
				<description><![CDATA[What Savings Glut?

Alan Greenspan responded to his critics on these pages on March 11. He singled out an op-ed by John Taylor a month earlier, "How Government Created the Financial Crisis" (Feb. 9), for special criticism. Mr. Greenspan's argument defending his policy is two-fold: (1) the Fed cont...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10074</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
			<title>Regime Uncertainty Puts Capital on Strike (Daily Podcast)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=850</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=850</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Most Banks Are Fine (Daily Podcast)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=839</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=839</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
				<title>The Problem With 'Nationalization' (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9996</link>
				<description><![CDATA[The chorus for nationalizing America's struggling banks is growing louder, and support for the idea comes from strange sources.

Alan Greenspan has said that he understands that "once in a hundred years" the government needs to take over the banks, and now is the time. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Repub...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9996</guid>
			</item>
			
</channel>
</rss>

