

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>David E. Bernstein (Author at The Cato Institute)</title>
<atom:link href="http://www.cato.org/rss/author.xml?auth_id=89/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://www.cato.org/people/david-bernstein</link>
<managingEditor>amast@cato.org (Andrew Mast)</managingEditor>
<description>
The Cato Institute seeks to broaden the parameters of public policy debate to allow consideration of the traditional American principles of limited government, individual liberty, free markets and peace. Toward that goal, the Institute strives to achieve greater involvement of the intelligent, concerned lay public in questions of policy and the proper role of government.
</description>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
				<title>The Role of Lochner in the Health Care Litigation (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=14213</link>
				<description><![CDATA[With the US Supreme Court poised to decide whether the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) individual mandate is unconstitutional, the ghost of the notorious 1905 Supreme Court decision in Lochner v. New York hovers over the case. Invalidate the mandate and you are resurrecting Lochner, legal briefs support...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=14213</guid>
			</item>
			
</channel>
</rss>


