

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Benjamin H. Friedman (Author at The Cato Institute)</title>
<atom:link href="http://www.cato.org/rss/author.xml?auth_id=994/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://www.cato.org/people/benjamin-friedman</link>
<managingEditor>amast@cato.org (Andrew Mast)</managingEditor>
<description>
The Cato Institute seeks to broaden the parameters of public policy debate to allow consideration of the traditional American principles of limited government, individual liberty, free markets and peace. Toward that goal, the Institute strives to achieve greater involvement of the intelligent, concerned lay public in questions of policy and the proper role of government.
</description>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
			<title>Winner of F-22 Squabble: Common Sense (Scholar Comments)</title>
			<link>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=252#blurb290</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Senate's vote to kill the wasteful and outdated F-22 fighter program is a win for the Pentagon and its efforts to overcome the parochial interests that make the defense budget into a local jobs program.</p>

<p>On the other hand, the triumph of common sense on the F-22 does little for taxpayers. An under-reported quirk of the Senate measure: new F-22s would have been paid for by cutting other defense spending, not by spending more in total. The F-22 outcome should not distract us from the reality that the defense budget, at $534 billion not including funding for numerous conflicts, is still way too high. In real dollars, that's more than the U.S. spent at any time in the Cold War.  And most of the spending has little to do with counterterrorism or the ongoing wars.</p>

<p>There are plenty of other wasteful programs in the Defense Authorization bill that would not survive the scrutiny that stopped the F-22. In the long term, the way to save money on defense is by adopting a new grand strategy of restraint, which would in turn lessen the need for an enormous military and countless other platforms that are nearly as costly and unnecessary as the F-22.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.cato.org/pressroom.php?display=ncomments&amp;id=252#blurb290</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
				<title>Obama's Disappointing Secrecy (Commentary)</title>
				<link>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10374</link>
				<description><![CDATA[He promised openness. Instead, like Bush's, his administration wants the power to keep Congress in the dark on some intelligence activities.

The Obama administration promised an "unprecedented level of openness in government."

The White House website says that citizens have a right to know wha...]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10374</guid>
			</item>
			
</channel>
</rss>

