For years, local, state, and federal governments and diverse private sources have funded early intervention programs for low-income children, and benefits to the children have been few and fleeting. There is also evidence that middle-class children gain little, if anything, from preschool. Benefits to children in public preschools are unlikely to be greater or more enduring.

Public preschool for younger children is irresponsible, given the failure of the public school system to educate the children currently enrolled. The desire to “do something” for young children should be tempered by the facts, and proposals for universal preschool should be rejected.

More on Early Childhood

Commentary

Head Start: A Tragic Waste of Money

By Andrew J. Coulson. New York Post. January 28, 2010.

President’s Preschool Emphasis Is Misdirected

By Andrew J. Coulson. Cato.org. April 13, 2009.

Obama on Education: Change or Politics as Usual

By Neal McCluskey. TownHall.com. March 18, 2009.

Cato Studies

The Poverty of Preschool Promises: Saving Children and Money with the Early Education Tax Credit

By Adam B. Schaeffer. Policy Analysis No. 641. August 3, 2009.

Universal Preschool Is No Golden Ticket: Why Government Should Not Enter the Preschool Business

By Darcy Ann Olsen. Policy Analysis No. 333. February 9, 1999.

The Advancing Nanny State: Why the Government Should Stay Out of Child Care

By Darcy Ann Olsen. Policy Analysis No. 285. October 23, 1997.

Public Filings

Child Care

By Darcy Ann Olsen. Testimony. February 23, 1998.

Downsizing the Federal Government

Head Start and Other Subsidies

By Tad DeHaven. September 2010.