[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Downsizing the U.S. Department of Agriculture

Downsizing the Federal Government

Facts and Figures

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)


Department of Agriculture Spending by Program Area

Department of Agriculture Spending by Activity

Downsize This!


Spending Cuts Summary

Here are proposed spending cuts to downsize the USDA. The cuts would save federal taxpayers $80 billion annually, or $696 for every U.S. household.


Timeline of Government Growth

See this timeline for a list of key events in the USDA’s growth.


Reading Room

Here are useful data sources and studies that describe the operations and shortcomings of USDA programs.


Cato Experts

Chris Edwards, director of tax policy studies, cedwards@cato.org
Daniel T. Griswold, director, center for trade policy studies, dgriswold@cato.org
Sallie James, trade policy analyst, sjames@cato.org
Stephen Slivinski, director of budget studies, sslivinski@cato.org
Randal O'Toole, senior fellow, rotoole@cato.org


New Cato Study on the 2007 Farm Bill




"Cato is on the right track with its proposals to downsize the USDA. Many of the department’s programs originated in the Great Depression and are completely out of date and no longer needed, if they ever were. Downsizing the USDA would help move American agriculture into the 21st century."

- John R. Norton, Deputy Secretary of Agriculture, 1985-1986