Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20001-5403

Phone (202) 842 0200
Fax (202) 842 3490
Contact Us
Support Cato

March 29, 2004

Spender vs. Spender

by Chris Edwards

Chris Edwards is director of fiscal policy at the Cato Institute.

John Kerry is the consummate modern candidate with his blow-dry hair, earnest tone, and easy ability at covering all sides of every issue. He has also mastered the art of giving rousing stump speeches that say little by using vacuous statements, such as "we need a real deal that stands up to the powerful interests."

Perhaps Kerry's greatest campaign asset is his ability to design spending initiatives that target every conceivable special interest. The following is a list of spending proposals mined from John Kerry's website. By my count, the website includes at least 79 separate initiatives that would create new programs or step up spending on current programs.

There is one interest group that the senator has forgotten about: the American taxpayers who would pay for all this new spending.

Agriculture

AIDS Plan

Americans with Disabilities

Children

Economy and Jobs

Education

Energy and Environment

Health

Homeland Security

Housing

National Service

Native Americans

Small Business

Technology

Urban America

Veterans and Military

What is the total price tag for John Kerry's promises? Nobody knows, since few are costed-out by the candidate. Besides, the prescription-drug bill jumped one-third in cost after it was signed into law, illustrating that federal programs usually cost more than promised anyway.

What Kerry's promises reveal is a candidate who thinks that the solution to every societal ill -- real or perceived -- is an expanded federal budget. In November, Americans will have to decide whether Kerry's big-spending promises are worse than Bush's big-spending record.

This article originally appeared on NRO on March 29, 2004.