Skip to main content
Home
  • Research
      • Studies
      • Centers and Projects
      • Research by Topic
      • Recent Books

      Latest Study

      Move to Defend: The Case against the Constitutional Amendments Seeking to Overturn Citizens United

      John Samples

      Three years ago the U.S. Supreme Court decided the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. It found that Congress lacked...
  • Events
      • Upcoming
      • Archives
      • Multimedia
      • FAQs
      • Cato University
      • Directions
      • Cato Live

      Featured Event

      May 17

      The Implications of the Expanding U.S. Drone Program

      Featuring Benjamin H. Friedman, Research Fellow in Defense and Homeland Security Studies, Cato Institute; Spencer Ackerman, Senior Writer, WIRED Magazine; and Julian Sanchez, Research Fellow, Cato Institute; moderated by Laura Odato, Director of Government Affairs, Cato Institute.

  • Publications
      • Books
      • Studies
      • Legal Briefs
      • Cato Handbook for Policymakers
      • Cato Journal
      • Cato's Letter
      • Cato's Letters
      • Cato Papers on Public Policy
      • Cato Policy Report
      • Cato State Legislative Guide
      • Economic Freedom of the States of India
      • Economic Freedom of the World
      • Regulation
      • Supreme Court Review

      Featured Publication

      Spring/Summer 2013

      We are grateful to the Harry and Lynde Bradley Foundation and the Carthage Foundation whose support of the October 2012 Cato Conference “Europe’s Crisis and the Welfare State: Lessons for the United States” made possible this special issue of the Cato Journal.
  • Commentary
    • Latest Multimedia

      Mao Yushi’s winning of the 2012 Milton Friedman Prize was mentioned on Bon TV’s China Take

      May 23, 2013

      The Implications of the Expanding U.S. Drone Program

      May 23, 2013

      More Multimedia

      Latest Commentary

      Amartya Sen Wrong in His Claim That Delay in Food Bill Killing a Thousand Every Week

      Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar

      Amartya Sen, as befits a Nobel laureate, has often produced careful calculations to throw light on dark situations, such as the number of...

      More Commentary

      Latest Blog Post

      Toward Managed Trade in Solar Panels

      K. William Watson

      With price floors and quotas, the United States is looking to broker an international solar cartel. 

      More Blog Posts

  • Store
      • Books
      • Subscriptions
      • Merchandise
      • Lands' End Apparel
      • My Cart

      Featured Book

      Poverty and Progress: Realities and Myths About Global Poverty

      Deepak Lal

      Renowned development economist Deepak Lal draws on 50 years of experience around the globe to describe developing-country realities and rectify misguided notions about economic progress.
  • Support
      • Other Ways to Give
      • Double Your Donation
      • Benefits of Cato Sponsorship
      • Renew
      • Donate Now

      More Bang for Your Buck

      The Cato Institute tops a new measure of think tank performance in the United States, according to a recent report. Cato bested all other U.S. think tanks in the main category of “Aggregate Profile per Dollar Spent.” “I’m grateful to the Center for Global Development for showing that Cato gives its sponsors something I wish government gave more of to taxpayers: bang for the buck,” said Cato CEO John Allison.

  • About Cato
  • Blog
  • Our Experts
  • For Media
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Search form

Foreign Policy and National Security: Studies

“Limiting Government through Direct Democracy: The Case of State Tax and Expenditure Limitations,”

By Michael J. New. Policy Analysis No. 420. December 13, 2001.

“The Anti-Terrorism Coalition: Don’t Pay an Excessive Price,”

By Charles V. Peña. Foreign Policy Briefing No. 68. December 11, 2001.

“Watching You: Systematic Federal Surveillance of Ordinary Americans,”

By Charlotte Twight. Briefing Paper No. 69. October 17, 2001.

“Economic Security: A National Security Folly?,”

By Donald Losman. Policy Analysis No. 409. August 1, 2001.

“Missing the Target: The Failure of the Helms-Burton Act,”

By Mark A. Groombridge. Trade Briefing Paper No. 12. June 5, 2001.

“Reducing a Common Danger: Improving Russia’s Early-Warning System,”

By Geoffrey Forden. Policy Analysis No. 399. May 3, 2001.

“Death Knell for NATO? The Bush Administration Confronts the European Security and Defense Policy,”

By Christopher Layne. Policy Analysis No. 394. April 4, 2001.

“The Rogue State Doctrine and National Missile Defense,”

By Ivan Eland and Daniel Lee. Foreign Policy Briefing No. 65. March 29, 2001.

“Arrogance of Power Reborn: The Imperial Presidency and Foreign Policy in the Clinton Years,”

By Gene Healy. Policy Analysis No. 389. December 13, 2000.

“Are We Prepared for Terrorism Using Weapons of Mass Destruction? Government’s Half Measures,”

By Eric R. Taylor. Policy Analysis No. 387. November 6, 2000.

“A Policy toward Cuba That Serves U.S. Interests,”

By Philip Peters. Policy Analysis No. 384. November 2, 2000.

“A Hollow Debate on Military Readiness,”

By Ivan Eland. Foreign Policy Briefing No. 62. October 17, 2000.

“A Foreign Policy Report Card on the Clinton-Gore Administration,”

By Jonathan Clarke. Policy Analysis No. 382. October 3, 2000.

“Constitutional Problems with Enforcing the Biological Weapons Convention,”

By Ronald D. Rotunda. Foreign Policy Briefing No. 61. September 28, 2000.

“From the Sea: National Missile Defense Is Neither Cheap Nor Easy,”

By Charles V. Peña. Foreign Policy Briefing No. 60. September 6, 2000.

“Arms Control and Missile Defense: Not Mutually Exclusive,”

By Charles V. Peña. Policy Analysis No. 376. July 26, 2000.

“Let’s Make National Missile Defense Truly “National”,”

By Ivan Eland. Foreign Policy Briefing No. 58. June 27, 2000.

“Dubious Anniversary: Kosovo One Year Later,”

By Christopher Layne and Benjamin Schwarz. Policy Analysis No. 373. June 10, 2000.

“”Isolationism” as the Denial of Intervention: What Foreign Policy Is and Isn’t,”

By Earl C. Ravenal. Foreign Policy Briefing No. 57. April 27, 2000.

“Green Wars: Making Environmental Degradation a National Security Issue Puts Peace and Security at Risk,”

By Paul Benjamin. Policy Analysis No. 369. April 20, 2000.

“The United States Should Begin Work on a New Bomber Now,”

By Williamson Murray. Policy Analysis No. 368. March 16, 2000.

“Faulty Justifications and Ominous Prospects: NATO’s “Victory” in Kosovo,”

By Christopher Layne. Policy Analysis No. 357. October 25, 1999.

“Strengthening the Biological Weapons Convention: Illusory Benefits and Nasty Side Effects,”

By Eric R. Taylor. Policy Analysis No. 355. October 18, 1999.

“Fixing What Ain’t Broke: The Renewed Call for Conscription,”

By Doug Bandow. Policy Analysis No. 351. August 31, 1999.

“Warrior Cops: The Ominous Growth of Paramilitarism in American Police Departments,”

By Diane Cecilia Weber. Briefing Paper No. 50. August 26, 1999.

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • next ›
  • last »

Sign Up

Receive periodic updates on Cato research and publications.

See our full list of email newsletters

Also from Cato

  • DownsizingGovernment.org
  • Libertarianism.org
  • Cato Unbound
  • PoliceMisconduct.net
  • Overlawyered
  • ElCato.org
  • Cato on Campus

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • YouTube
  • Mobile
  • RSS
image

Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20001-5403

  • Phone (202) 842 0200
  • Fax (202) 842 3490