|SSP No. 32||February 17, 2004|
by Michael Tanner
Michael Tanner is director of the Cato Institute's Project on Social Security Choice and editor of Social Security and Its Discontents: Perspectives on Choice (2004).
For the past several years there has been a growing consensus about the need to reform Social Security. Now, however, the debate has advanced to the point where it becomes important to move beyond generalities and provide specific proposals for transforming Social Security to a system of individual accounts. The Cato Project on Social Security Choice, therefore, has developed a proposal to give workers ownership of and control over their retirement funds.Under this proposal:
We expect this plan to restore Social Security to long-term and sustainable solvency and to do so at a cost that is less than the cost of simply propping up the existing program. And it would do far more than that.
Younger workers who chose the individual account option would receive benefits substantially higher than those that could be paid under traditional Social Security. At the same time, the plan would treat women and minorities more fairly and allow low-income workers to accumulate real wealth.
Most important, this proposal would reduce Americans' reliance on government and give individuals greater ownership of wealth, as well as responsibility for and control over their own lives. It would be a profound and significant increase in individual liberty.
|Full Text of SSP No. 32 (PDF, 16 pgs, 67 Kb)|
© 2004 The Cato Institute
Please send comments to webmaster