Cato Institute
Cato Project on Social Security Choice
<<  <  >  >>
We expect this
substantially greater than those that are current-
Introduction
proposal to
ly payable under traditional Social Security.
restore Social
They would own and control those assets. At
For the past several years there has been a
the same time, women and minorities would be
growing consensus about the need to reform
Security to
treated fairly, and low-income workers could
Social Security. As the debate has developed,
long-term and
accumulate real wealth.
the Cato Institute has provided studies and
sustainable
Most important, this proposal would reduce
other information on the problems facing
Americans' reliance on government and give
Social Security and the advantages of individ-
solvency and
individuals greater responsibility for and con-
ual accounts as a way to reform the system. But
to do so at a
trol over their own lives. It would provide a
until now we have not suggested a specific plan
cost less than
profound and significant increase in individual
for reform.
liberty.
Now, however, the debate has advanced to
the cost of
the point where it becomes important to move
simply
beyond generalities and provide specific pro-
continuing the
posals for transforming Social Security to a
The Social Security Crisis
system of individual accounts. The Cato Project
existing
on Social Security Choice, therefore, has devel-
Social Security as we know it is facing irre-
program.
oped a proposal to give workers ownership of
sistible demographic and fiscal pressures that
and control over their retirement funds.
threaten the future retirement benefits of today's
This plan would establish voluntary person-
young workers. Although Social Security is cur-
al accounts for workers born on or after January
rently running a surplus, according to the sys-
1, 1950. Workers would have the option of (a)
tem's own trustees, that surplus will turn into a
deficit within the next 15 years.1 That is, by 2018
depositing their half of the current payroll tax
(6.2 percentage points) in an individual account
Social Security will be paying out more in bene-
and forgoing future accrual of Social Security
fits than it takes in through taxes (Figure 1).
retirement benefits or (b) remaining in the tra-
In theory, Social Security is supposed to con-
ditional Social Security system and receiving
tinue paying benefits after 2018 by drawing on
the level of retirement benefits payable on a
the Social Security Trust Fund. The trust fund is
sustainable basis given current revenue and
supposed to provide sufficient funds to contin-
expenditure projections.
ue paying full benefits until 2042, after which it
Workers choosing the individual account
will be exhausted. At that point, by law, Social
option would have a variety of investment
Security benefits will have to be cut by approx-
imately 27 percent.2
options, with the number of options increasing as
the size of their accounts increased. The initial
However, in reality, the Social Security Trust
default option would be a balanced fund, weight-
Fund is not an asset that can be used to pay ben-
ed 60 percent stocks and 40 percent bonds.
efits. Any Social Security surpluses accumulat-
Workers choosing the individual account option
ed to date have been spent, leaving a trust fund
would also receive bonds recognizing their past
that consists only of government bonds (IOUs)
contributions to Social Security.
that will eventually have to be repaid by tax-
At retirement, workers would be able to
payers. As the Clinton administration's fiscal
choose an annuity, a programmed withdrawal
year 2000 budget explained it:
option, or the combination of an annuity and a
lump-sum payment. The government would
These [Trust Fund] balances are available
maintain a safety net to insure that no senior
to finance future benefit payments and
would retire with income less than 120 percent
other Trust Fund expenditures--but only
of the poverty level.
in a bookkeeping sense. . . . They do not
We expect this proposal to restore Social
consist of real economic assets that can be
Security to long-term and sustainable solvency
drawn down in the future to fund benefits.
and to do so at a cost less than the cost of sim-
Instead, they are claims on the Treasury
ply continuing the existing program. And it
that, when redeemed, will have to be
would do far more than that.
financed by raising taxes, borrowing from
Workers who chose the individual account
the public, or reducing benefits or other
option could accumulate retirement resources
expenditures. The existence of large Trust
2