Cato Institute
Cato Project on Social Security Choice
<<  <  >  >>
that also averages a 10 percent return, except it
Figure 2
moves in the opposite direction. An investment
Distribution of Annual Returns of the U.S. Market
in either portfolio would earn a 10 percent return
with volatility. But an equal investment in each
12
portfolio would earn the same 10 percent with
no volatility at all because of their perfect nega-
tive correlation.
10
It is common practice to construct portfolios
using many different asset classes that are not
8
highly correlated to achieve less risk for any
given return. This diversification protects the
investor from a dramatic fall in any single mar-
6
ket. However, it also reduces the return to the
portfolio from a single market's spectacular
4
performance.
Given the financial structure of Social
Security and the history of markets, one could
2
reasonably estimate the future tradeoff between
a pay-as-you-go and a market-based retirement
system. The former will require tax increases
0
and/or benefit cuts resulting in lower returns
than projected under current law, which are
already substantially below market rates for
Return
today's younger workers.21 The latter would
This is the annual return of a 90 percent large capitalization and 10 percent small capitalization equity portfolio. Data are
allow retirement benefits in excess of those
from Ibbotson and Associates, Stocks, Bonds, Bills and Inflation, 1997 Yearbook.
from Social Security even if the stock market
were to return only its worst long-run historical
performance.
Figure 3
Risk Reduced by Holding Two Uncorrelated Assets
Objection #4: Although the
16
stock market rises over the
long term, it could collapse at
14
the end of one's working career,
leaving little or nothing
12
for retirement.
Many critics of privatization admit that long-
10
term private investment trends are positive, but
warn that a short-term market drop could wipe
out a retiree's gains just when he needs it most.
8
Asset A
History shows that short-term market drops can
Asset B
be significant. Tables 5­7 list the worst ten
6
Portfolio
declines in percentage terms by day, month, and
quarter from 1926 to 1996. Data are taken from
S&P 500 1996 Directory.
4
As dramatic as they were, declines of this
Time
nature were infrequent. Figures 4 and 5 show
the frequency of monthly and quarterly returns,
respectively. The ten worst months, those with
declines of 14 percent or more, represented only
The vertical axis is annual return and the hor-
1.2 percent of all months; and the ten worst
izontal axis is time. The bold line depicts a port-
folio that averages a 10 percent return, but
quarters, declines of at least 18 percent,
which is volatile. The dashed line is a portfolio
accounted for only 3.6 percent of the total.
8