Cato Policy Report, vol. XVI, no. 6, November/December 1994
by George Will and Llowd Cutler Disagree
The practicality and constitutionality of term limits are
vigorously debated in a new book from the Cato Institute.The
Politics and Law of Term Limits, edited by Edward H. Crane,
president of the Cato Institute, and Roger Pilon, director of
Cato's Center for Constitutional Studies, is the definitive guide
to the hottest political issue in recent years. Voters in 16
states have already limited the terms of their members of
Congress. Eight more states have the question on the ballot this
November. The terms of state legislators and other officials have
been limited in 16 states and hundreds of counties and cities,
including New York and Los Angeles. In late November the Supreme
Court will hear oral argument in U.S.Term Limits v. Thornton,
a case challenging the constitutionality of the Arkansas
term-limit initiative.
Contributors toThe Politics and Law of Term Limits include
top names from the worlds of constitutional law, political science,
and grassroots organizing: presidential adviser Lloyd N. Cutler;
U.S. Term Limits executive director Paul Jacob; League of Women
Voters president Becky Cain; attorney John Kester, who will argue
the constitutionality of term limits before the Supreme Court
this fall; constitutional law authority Ronald D. Rotunda; law
professor Daniel H. Lowenstein; and Thomas E. Mann, director of
the Governmental Studies Program at the Brookings Institution.
Syndicated columnist George Will provides an introduction, as do
Crane and Pilon. "It is no overstatement to say," write
Crane and Pilon, "that the term-limits movement¦a national,
grassroots effort to limit the terms of elected officials at all
levels of government¦is emerging as one of the most important
developments in this nation in a very long time.... Term limits
speaks in fundamental ways to the question of how we will govern
ourselves. Although the political establishment has often been
slow, for understandable reasons, to acknowledge the movement, it
can be ignored no longer."
"Term limits," adds Will, "have come to remedy
what ails government."
Arguing for the political wisdom of term limits are Jacob and
Petracca, who say that term limits would end the careerism that undermines
representative government. They are opposed by Cain and Mann, who
counter that the real problems cited by advocates of term limits
would not be solved by such limits. Kester and Rotunda set forth
their cases for the constitutionality of term limits; they point
out that the Constitution does not prohibit the states from
limiting terms and in fact empowers the states to regulate the
"time, place, and manner" of elections. Cutler and
Lowenstein rebut that argument by noting that since the
Constitution specifies qualifications for members of Congress,
the states cannot enact more onerous standards.
The book received enthusiastic prepublication praise.
Constitutional authority Floyd Abrams said that "as the
desirability and constitutionality of term limits become
increasing central, the need for a volume that sets forth both
sides¦all sides¦of the debate becomes all the more pressing.The
Politics and Law of Term Limits does just that. Here, in one
place, are powerful arguments pro and con rooted in history,
philosophy, politics, and law. The book is an indispensable
collection of diverse views on one of the most intellectually
challenging and pragmatically sig- nificant issues of our
time."
Governor William F. Weld of Massachusetts said, "This is a
mind-expanding treatment of a fascinating public policy issue. You
feel as though you're watching a fifteen-round fight where both
combatants are knocked to the canvas, but somebody's eventually
going to win."
Pete du Pont of the National Center for Policy Analysis called it
the "best discussion of an issue whose time has clearly
come."
This article originally appeared in the November/December 1994 edition of Cato Policy Report.