|Cato Policy Analysis No. 305||April 29, 1998|
by Peter J. Ferrara
Peter J. Ferrara is general counsel and chief economist with Americans for Tax Reform and an associate policy analyst at the Cato Institute.
The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 made extensive Medicare reforms to delay the impending financial collapse of the system for a few years. But those changes do not sufficiently address the long-term problems of the program. In fact, Medicare's long-term problems remain deep and intractable. Even after the 1997 reforms, by the time today's young workers retire, Medicare's current sources of funding will likely be sufficient to finance only 50 percent or less of the promised benefits.
Such an enormous financial gap cannot be closed by raising taxes and cutting benefits, which would greatly harm working people and retirees. The only solution is to reform the system by taking advantage of the efficiencies, incentives, competition, and productivity of the private sector.
Every retiree should be free to use his share of Medicare funds to purchase private health insurance. In addition, every worker should be free to put his Medicare taxes into a personal health savings account rather than the Medicare program, using the accumulated funds to pay for health care and health insurance during retirement. Because of the high returns that result from investing in private capital markets, those privately invested accounts would be able to pay significantly higher benefits than Medicare.
Essentially, these proposed reforms would shift control over Medicare from Washington to individual retirees and workers across the country. That Medicare reform would ensure that workers and retirees achieve more freedom and prosperity than are possible under the current system.
|Full Text of Policy Analysis No. 305 (PDF, 24 pgs, 74 Kb)|
© 1998 The Cato Institute
Please send comments to webmaster