Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
cials. After receiving the complaints,
kids to do this one." Hetler said about 5
Brooklyn schools superintendent Jeff
of North Dakota's 15 schools that offer
Lampert cancelled the assignment. By
debate had problems with the topic.
then, though, word of the assignment
Mandan School District superintendent
had gotten to the media, and it spurred
Kent Hjelmstad explained further, saying
days of intensive debate and news cover-
that he thought "the message is that you
age. Lampert was not happy that the
want the experience of an academic chal-
issue had blown up. "We didn't take this
lenge, but you don't need to have objec-
lightly," he said. "We are a partnership.
tionable discussions to get that chal-
If you have a concern, an issue, call me;
lenge." Other people were struck by
call someone in the district."172
debaters dodging such a heavily argued
subject. "It's unfathomable that we're not
going to allow some of the brightest,
Oklahoma
most articulate kids you can find have an
Intelligent Design
· A poll of Oklahomans released in mid-
intelligent discussion on intelligent
design," lamented Adam Burnside, the
February revealed a severely divided pop-
debate coach at Dilworth-Glyndon-
ulation when it comes to teaching intelli-
Felton, a Minnesota district that often
gent design. The SoonerPoll.com survey
competes with North Dakota schools.170
found that 48.5 percent of Oklahomans
supported teaching intelligent design in
science classes, while 35 percent opposed
Ohio
teaching it. Perhaps as a reflection of the
Intelligent Design
· Columbus--In 2002 the Ohio Board of
support for teaching intelligent design,
at least three bills allowing local districts
Education added a passage to state sci-
to teach it in science classes were wending
ence standards saying that students
their way through the state legislature at
should be able to "describe how scientists
the time the poll was released. In opposi-
continue to investigate and critically ana-
tion to what those bills would allow,
lyze aspects of evolutionary theory." That
however, one poll respondent clearly stat-
passage had been controversial ever since,
ed where he thought intelligent design
and in February the state school board
should be taught. "It's not a scientific
decided to delete it from Ohio's stan-
question," said Charles Van Boskirk.
dards. Board member Martha Wise
"You can teach it in religion class, but not
praised the move, saying, "it is deeply
in science."173
unfair to the children of this state to mis-
lead them about science." Supporters of
the deleted passage, however, were deter-
Oregon
mined to keep fighting. "We'll do this
Intelligent Design
· Salem--With intelligent design a hot issue
forever, I guess," said board member
Michael Cochran."171
all over the country, in September offi-
cials at the Oregon Department of
Education thought it best to reiterate
Freedom of Expression
· Brooklyn--In January, a teacher gave stu-
official policy: Creationism can be dis-
cussed in comparative religion or litera-
dents an assignment requiring them to
ture, but not science class. "It's a classic
research the internet porn industry, and
disconnect between science and religion,
relate their reactions to what they
and the state has no problem coming out
found. Several parents were upset about
on where schools should be," said
the assignment, however, feeling that it
Department of Education spokesman
was inappropriate for high school fresh-
Gene Evans. Not all Oregonians agreed.
men, and complained to school offi-
44