interests associated with various disease con-
plans would cost between $134 and $160 a
stituencies and health care specialties. Groups
month, after taxes, per person, or between
$350 and $500 for a family plan.39 Some of the
battled each other to make sure that their needs
or services were included in the list of covered
cost would be offset by subsidies, on a sliding
services. The list was repeatedly revised to
scale, so that a single person making $23,925 a
reflect, not the best medical judgment, but out-
year would pay $18.46 per week for health
insurance.40 That would still be nearly $1,000
side pressure. The legislature repeatedly inter-
vened. The U.S. Office of Technology Assess-
per year, a substantial burden for someone in
ment concluded that Oregon's prioritization
that income range.
plan "has not operated as the scientific vessel of
The Heritage Foundation has taken per-
rationing that it was advertised to be. Although
haps the least prescriptive approach, with a
initial rankings were based in large part on
mandate for catastrophic coverage, defined
mathematical values, controversies around the
essentially as a "stop loss" policy protecting a
list forced administrators to make political con-
family against total health care costs above a
certain level.41
cessions and move medical services `by hand' to
satisfy constituency pressures."45
Whatever the initial minimum benefits pack-
age consists of, special interests representing var-
And when the Clinton administration pro-
ious health care providers and disease con-
posed a minimum benefits package as part of its
stituencies can certainly be expected to lobby for
1993 health care reform plan, provider lobbying
inclusion under any mandated benefits package.
groups spent millions of dollars in advertising
To see this in action, one simply has to look to
calling for the inclusion of specific provider
state mandates for health insurance benefits.
groups or coverage of specific conditions.
The number of laws requiring that all insurance
Public choice dynamics is such that
policies sold in a state provide coverage for speci-
providers (who would make money from the
fied diseases, conditions, and providers has been
increased demand for their services) and dis-
skyrocketing. In the 1960s there were only a
ease constituencies (whose members natural-
handful of such mandates, but today there are
ly have an urgent desire for coverage of their
more than 1,800.42 The list includes mandates
illness or condition) will always have a strong
incentive to lobby lawmakers for inclusion in
for coverage of hair transplants (Connecticut,
any minimum benefits package. The public
Massachusetts, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri,
at large will likely see resisting the small pre-
New Hampshire, and Oklahoma), massage ther-
mium increase caused by any particular addi-
apy (Florida, Maryland, New Hampshire, and
tional benefit as unworthy of a similar effort.
Washington), and pastoral counseling (Maine
Public choice
and North Carolina).43
It is a simple case of concentrated benefits
dynamics is such
and diffuse costs.
Or consider Oregon's attempt to prioritize
Medicaid services. In 1992 Oregon guaranteed
that providers
all state residents under the poverty line a basic
and disease
Spiraling Downward toward
level of health care. At the same time, because
National Health Care
constituencies
funding was limited, the Oregon Health
Services Commission drafted a priority-ranked
will always have
list of medical services available to Oregonians.
Individual mandates cross an important
a strong incentive
The state would fund services deemed priority
practical and philosophical line: once we
on the basis of such factors as cost, duration of
accept the principle that it is the government's
to lobby
a treatment, benefit, improvement in the
responsibility to ensure that every American
lawmakers for
patient's quality of life, and community values.
has health insurance, we guarantee even more
inclusion in any
Services that did not qualify under those crite-
government involvement with and control
ria would not be funded.44 However, political
over large portions of our health care system.
minimum
Compulsory, government-defined insurance
calculations quickly became part of the ranking
benefits package.
opens the door to even more widespread regu-
process, with the program a battleground for
7