Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
transforms the composition of industry, mak-
Still other regulations have a more immedi-
ing it more sophisticated and cleaner.63
ate impact on the economy and can be met only
through substantial expenditure. The EU envi-
Similarly, the World Economic Forum's 2001
ronmental regulations include directives con-
Environmental Sustainability Index found that
cerning the quality of drinking water, bathing
environmental standards rise with increases in
water, and groundwater.58 They set national
per capita GDP.64
emission ceilings for atmospheric pollutants
"As [a] country sees its standard of living
such as sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and
rise through economic liberalization and
other oxides of nitrogen and limit emissions
trade expansion," Cato scholar Daniel
from large combustion plants, compression-
Griswold explains, "its industry can more
ignition  engines,  and  positive-ignition
readily afford to control emissions. Its citi-
engines.59 The EU also requires compliance
zens have more to spend, above what they
with costly directives on all types of waste.60
need for subsistence, on the `luxury good' of
improved environmental quality. . . . That
Compliance with EU environmental stan-
explains why the most stringent environmen-
dards will have to be policed by scores of addi-
tal laws in the world today are found in devel-
tional public officials. In 2002 the EU approv-
oped countries that are relatively open to
ingly noted that the Czech Ministry of the
trade."65 To put it differently, the EU should
Environment beefed up its staff, which then
carried out about 19,500 inspections and
have focused on rapid growth in CEE, which
imposed 2,627 fines worth approximately 2.1
would be followed, not preceded, by improve-
million euros.61 Overall, the EU Commission
ments in environmental standards.
The EU is clearly aware of the impact that its
estimated the cost of CEE compliance with
legislation will have on the CEE economies. As
the new environmental regulations at between
80 billion and 120 billion euros.62
the EU Commission states, when it comes to the
environment, "there will be no lowering of stan-
That expense will have to be met by the end
dards--a basic principle that applies to all aspects
of the transition period, which most CEECs
of the enlargement process. This is important
negotiated in order to spread the costs of envi-
also for the unity of the Single Market, to ensure
ronmental adjustment. The conclusions of
a level playing field for business."66Unfortunately,
the transition periods vary, but most will come
to an end by 2013. In other words, over the
the EU will create that "level playing field" by
next 10 years, the CEECs will have to meet
making the CEECs less competitive.
environmental expenditures of as much as 10
billion euros per year. The CEE governments
Common Agricultural Policy
By insisting on
will have to assume the increased financial
The Common Agricultural Policy is one of
burden and meet it out of general taxation or
the most controversial parts of the European
Western environ-
borrowing. Private enterprises will see their
project. The CAP consumes 46 percent of the
mental standards,
profits diminished by increased taxation; con-
EU's total annual budget of 100 billion euros.
sumers will have to pick up the tab for lower-
As one European commentator, William Rees-
the EU will likely
ing emissions; and municipalities will have to
Mogg, noted: "The annual dairy subsidies given
contribute to the
find the funds to improve standards for waste-
by the CAP and the European governments put
prolongation of
water and solid waste.
together come to more than $800 per cow. That
By insisting on Western environmental stan-
is greater than the individual income of half the
economic malaise
dards, the EU will likely contribute to the pro-
world's population including more than one
in CEE.
country from the former Soviet Union."67 Of
longation of economic malaise in CEE. That is
especially troubling since the EU approach to
course, agricultural subsidies are common
the environment goes against a growing body of
throughout the world and amount to an annu-
research that links environmental improve-
al $300 billion in OECD countries alone. Still,
ments to economic growth. One OECD study,
the EU spends almost twice as much to subsi-
dize its farmers as does the United States.68
for example, found that economic development
10