The EU members
Community workers in order to avoid possi-
which workers are exposed. Measurement
ble distortions of competition."45 The EU does
shall be carried out in accordance with Point
with the most
2 of Part A or Point 2 of Part B of the Annex
not offer criteria for determining what a com-
rigid labor mar-
to this Directive, as appropriate."40
petitive distortion is or how it plans to legis-
kets are determin-
late without creating market distortions.
The European Commission started to reg-
However, as other EU statements demon-
ulate employment laws, health and safety in
ing the EU's
strate, the EU's understanding of "competi-
the workplace, and equal opportunities in
social agenda.
tive distortion" has less to do with possible
the early 1970s. In 1989 the Social Charter
market failure than with old-fashioned pro-
was adopted. The principles of the charter
tectionism. As the official website of the EU
were then incorporated into the Maastricht
Commission explains: "The EU has estab-
Treaty in 1992. The aim of those measures is
lished a set of conditions for membership
"the development and full implementation
that new member states must fulfill. They
of minimum social standards for the single
market."41 Thus, many aspects of labor law
include the requirement that each new mem-
ber must implement and enforce EU law,
are being "harmonized" at a European level.
which includes key areas of social policy such
The EU has issued directives in the fields of
as limits on working time, minimum stan-
"collective redundancies (i.e., layoffs), safe-
dards of safety in the workplace, gender
guarding of employment rights in case of
equality and other measures to combat dis-
transfer of undertaking, employer obligation
crimination. Thus the risk of `social dump-
to inform employees of the condition applic-
ing' will be avoided."46
able to the employment contract, guarantee
for the employees in case of insolvency of the
From an economic point of view, it would
employer, posting of workers and organiza-
seem that the CEE economies ought to
tion of working time," and minimum health
derive maximum benefits from lower costs of
and safety standards in the workplace.42
production, not least because their produc-
tivity lags behind that of their western coun-
The EU mandates that the CEECs phase
terparts--something that the EU actually rec-
in a body of such directives, with each phase
ognizes. To stay competitive, in other words,
becoming progressively more restrictive as to
the CEECs need to keep the costs of produc-
the freedom of contract between employer
tion down. The alternative to increasing pro-
and employee and more costly with regard to
ductivity is growing unemployment. And the
enforcement. Although the EU claims to
latter is precisely what the EU laws will lead
wish to "avoid imposing administrative,
to. In countries such as Poland and Slovakia,
financial and legal constraints which would
where 20 percent of the working population
hold back the creation and development of
is unemployed, regulations against the pejo-
small and medium sized undertakings," its
policies are likely to have that effect.43
ratively labeled concept of "social dumping"
contribute not to alleviation but to worsen-
The EU explicitly rejects the possibility of
ing of the workers' lot.
different levels of safety and health protection
Here the East German example is most
of labor within the union. Instead, it asserts the
instructive, for it shows how an artificial
need to harmonize health and safety standards
increase in labor costs proved counterproduc-
irrespective of the different needs of the mem-
tive to East German economic development
ber states. Thus, the EU's founding health and
and led to the perpetuation of high unem-
safety legislation directive rejects the idea of tak-
ployment. In 2000, a decade after German
ing the costs of health and safety regulations
into account in business decisionmaking.44
unification and 2 trillion deutsche marks of
financial transfers later, unemployment in
According to the EU, legislation is neces-
the eastern part of the Federal Republic was
sary "not only to ensure the health and safety
more than twice as high as it was in the west.47
of each worker on an individual basis, but also
to create a minimum basis of protection for all
That is exactly what Kadi Parnits, president of
8