Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
inefficient government in a growing economy
who were correct in their analysis of the events
is more tolerable than a highly efficient gov-
leading to the present situation: those who
ernment in a shrinking economy. Real govern-
warned against floating the peso, protested
ment spending can be restrained by not
the freeze of bank deposits, decried the gov-
increasing the wages of government employ-
ernment's massive destruction of property
ees as fast as inflation. If inflation is 50 percent
rights, and emphasized the need for reducing
or more this year, as private-sector forecasts
tax rates. The implementation of Ecuador's
project, the reduction in real government
dollarization and other reforms of 2000 was
spending from retaining existing nominal lev-
hindered by the presence of officials in the
els of spending will be considerable. For the
central bank and ministry of economy who
future, one idea for making salary costs more
were known as strong opponents of dollariza-
flexible would be to index the wages of gov-
tion. Argentina should not make the same
ernment employees to those of private-sector
mistake. There is a small but capable group of
employees or to tax collections.65
economists, lawyers, financiers, and other per-
It has been suggested that government
sons in Argentina who should be willing to
spending should be the motor of economic
help politicians smart enough to ask them.
growth, in the manner suggested by John
The government
Maynard Keynes during the depression of
Conclusion
seems to have
the 1930s. Without entering into an involved
discussion of Keynes's ideas, it suffices to
confused tax
Argentina and the IMF
note that they were proposed for conditions
rates with
of deflation. Argentina today has begun
Argentina's negotiations with the IMF
tax revenues.
again to experience conditions of inflation. It
have so far resulted in no new loans, in part
is clear that under current conditions more
because the IMF thinks there is no "quick
government spending will lead to higher
fix" for Argentina, as its managing director,
Horst Köhler, has claimed.67 In reality, there
inflation but not higher growth--a combina-
tion familiar to Argentines from the 1980s.
is a quick fix, at least for the currency prob-
lem: dollarization. It could be done immedi-
Establish a More Transparent Fiscal
ately, and it would establish a truly fixed
Framework
exchange rate before eliminating pesos from
In addition to reducing tax rates and elimi-
circulation.
nating some taxes, the government should
Ecuador in January 2000 was also in the
introduce a new fiscal framework based on
midst of a depression, with a currency nobody
sound, transparent accounting. The govern-
trusted and a banking system far worse man-
ment should produce an annual balance sheet
aged than that of Argentina. In desperation,
and income statement, using a full accrual basis
on January 9, president Jamil Mahuad
(which is more complete than the cash basis the
announced dollarization, which had been pro-
government now uses) and applying generally
posed for months by a number of prominent
accepted accounting principles. The balance
local economists and businesspeople, as well
as by myself and a few other foreigners.68 The
sheet and the income statement should be
audited by private accounting firms. This type
next day the Ecuadorean sucre stabilized at
of fiscal framework was introduced in New
the announced rate of 25,000 per U.S. dollar
Zealand starting in 1989; among other things,
and remained there until sucres were eliminat-
it has discouraged corruption and promoted
ed from circulation. The interbank interest
honesty in government finances.66
rate tumbled from 200 percent on January 7
to 20 percent by January 11. Money began
Remember Who Was Right
flowing back into the banks, the economy
Finally, the government should entrust the
started growing, and tax revenue rose. Those
implementation of major reforms to persons
trends continue today.
29