Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
There were no signs that Musharraf's pol-
"constructively disengaging" from Pakistan,
icy was strengthening Pakistan's position in
while trying to advance in South Asia a new
Washington in the months preceding
strategic agenda based on strengthening
September 11. President Clinton gave
America's ties with India.
Musharraf's regime a diplomatic cold shoul-
In that context, Pakistan, as a client state,
der; during a South Asia tour, Clinton spent
should have been presented with a clear
five days in India and only five hours in
choice: adapt your policy to the goals of your
Pakistan.45 The new Bush administration
American benefactor or end up paying the
continued the process of marginalizing
costs of your refusal--being truly "ditched"
Pakistan and establishing more solid ties with
by Washington. Instead, Washington's inter-
India, as part of a strategy to contain China
ests were sabotaged by an uncontrollable
and expand ties with India's huge democracy
client state, ruled by a military dictatorship
and emerging market. All this occurred
in the process of establishing a theocracy and
against the backdrop of growing U.S. ten-
mismanaging its corrupt economic system.
sions with radical Islam and Washington's
That client state was spreading terror to
strengthening of ties with Israel and secular
Kashmir; strengthening the Taliban, the
Turkey, which only helped to highlight
world's most anti-Western regime; and
Pakistan was
Pakistan's pariah status. There was no indica-
acquiring weapons of mass destruction.
spreading terror
tion--strategic considerations, economic ties,
Such developments pointed to a major
ideological commitment, cultural bonds--
dilemma that the United States faces when it
to Kashmir;
that Washington needed to continue to main-
has to manage its relationship with a client
strengthening the
tain Pakistan as a client state. Conversely,
state in a unipolar international system.
Taliban, the
Pakistan seemed to be losing its leverage over
During the Cold War, the bipolar system pro-
U.S. policy, a clear reversal of what occurred
duced systemic pressures on the two super-
world's most
during Zia's years. The relationship between
powers to restrain their respective client
anti-Western
America and Pakistan was being normalized.
states. The United States and the Soviet
The dog was in control. In fact, the dog was
Union sent signals to each other that helped
regime; and
discovering that it had no need to regularly
to set diplomatic and military "red lines,"
acquiring
wag that particular tail.
which forced each superpower to place
weapons of mass
restrictions on its client states. For example,
the United States, facing Soviet pressure,
destruction.
The Pakistani Tail Tries to
stopped Israeli military advances in Egypt in
Wag the American Dog
1973. Similarly, the Soviets, during the
Cuban missile crisis in 1962, acceded to the
Again
pressure of the Kennedy administration.
Following
September
11
and
If the Soviet Union hadn't collapsed in
Washington's pressure on Pakistan to back
1991, it is quite conceivable that it would
the United States in the war against al-Qaeda
have set similar "red lines" on U.S. support
and the Taliban, Musharraf and other
for the Pakistani-backed insurgents in
Pakistani officials complained that the
Afghanistan, leading perhaps to the creation
United States had "abandoned" them after
of a neutral regime in Kabul or to the divi-
the withdrawal of Soviet forces from
sion of the country into spheres of influence,
Afghanistan in 1989. "We were left high and
which would have given Islamabad no choice
dry, and it started to settle on the people that
but to abandon its grand strategic designs. In
we were ditched," Musharraf told an
short, in a unipolar system, a client state may
American group. That was an exaggeration. A
be able to exert more influence on its global
clear U.S. realpolitik position, based on an
benefactor in the short term and the
accurate reading of U.S. interests at the time,
midterm, as Pakistan did for a while, creating
should have led to adoption of a policy of
conditions for the Taliban victory in Kabul.
13