Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Musharraf, as
Pakistani cooperation with Washington
cial resources and military assistance and
could also lead to an adjustment in what was
training, as well as thousands of volunteers to
head of
seen as the tilt toward India by the Bush
the forces of the Taliban and al-Qaeda. At the
Pakistan's mili-
administration. "It could even be, the wily
same time, such radical forces were the
tary, used his
General Musharraf may be dreaming, a reprise
domestic political and ideological backbone
of Cold-War days, when an indulgent United
of Musharraf's military dictatorship, which
alliance with rad-
States backed Pakistan for the sake of defeat-
was also committed to the development of
ical Muslim cler-
ing a common enemy in Afghanistan," specu-
the country's nuclear military power.
lated The Economist. In any case, if it proved
Musharraf, as head of Pakistan's military,
ics to provide
impossible to prevent the fall of the Taliban,
used his alliance with radical Muslim clerics
legitimacy to his
Pakistan was expecting to have a large say in
to provide legitimacy to his dictatorship,
dictatorship.
whatever order succeeded that regime, and per-
forming a powerful and destructive "mili-
haps even a less hostile U.S. attitude toward
tary-mosque" nexus. With Musharraf as its
Islamabad's efforts to develop a nuclear
head, that political nexus helped transform
weapons capability.17 One Pakistani official
Pakistan into a magnet for radical Islamic
argued that the Americans were now "aware of
terrorists in the region and around the world.
their past mistakes" of maginalizing Pakistan.
It was also the driving force behind the sup-
Pakistan, a "front line state" in the war against
port for Islamic insurgents, many of whom
terrorism, was telling the Americans that "you
had ties with Afghanistan-based guerrillas,
need us again" and was expecting that
who penetrated the Indian-controlled Kargil
Washington would be willing to take into con-
region of Kashmir in May 1999, a move that
sideration Pakistan's interests, including the
was a major blow to the budding détente
between Islamabad and New Delhi.19
need to "engage" the Taliban regime in negoti-
ations before taking military action against it.18
That crisis, in turn, brought about Indian
military retaliation and U.S. diplomatic pres-
sure that resulted in the withdrawal of
Pakistan's Flirtation with
Pakistani forces from Kargil, weakening the
Radical Islam
power of the democratically elected govern-
ment of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and cre-
Although Musharraf hoped to extract as
ating the conditions for his overthrow by
Musharraf's military coup in October 1999.20
much as he could from Washington in
exchange for his support in the war against
The proverbial man from Mars viewing
terrorism, he was bargaining with a very weak
U.S. foreign policy after September 11 would
hand because his government was interna-
probably be astonished at the inconsistency
tionally isolated and the Pakistani economy
of the U.S. record. Washington attached the
was bankrupt. In fact, in the months before
labels "anti-American" and "war criminal" to
the September 11 attacks, Pakistan was the
the former president of Yugoslavia, Slobodan
most important diplomatic and political ally,
Milosevic, a civilian politician elected in at
not of the United States, but of the Taliban
least quasi-democratic elections and whose
regime that harbored the al-Qaeda terrorists.
military had been at war in Kosovo and
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were the only
Bosnia with Muslim forces that had links to
Islamic radical movements.21 Yet Washington
governments that maintained formal diplo-
matic relationship with the radical Islamic
praised General Musharraf as "courageous"
leaders in Kabul. (Saudi Arabia, another sup-
and a "visionary leader" even though he was a
posed "ally" of Washington, was the most
military dictator in control of weapons of
important channel of funds for the Taliban).
mass destruction, was backed by radical anti-
Leading Pakistani political, military, and reli-
American forces, and was an ally of a regime
gious figures and radical Islamic groups were
that helped inflict the worst terrorist attack
providing direct support in the form of finan-
ever on the American territory and people.
5