Pursuing the
Russia and might be supporting research on
many projects are carried out without consid-
weapons of mass destruction.9 7
ering how--or even whether--they benefit U.S.
abstract goal of
If leakage into the Arctic does happen on
security. As environmental projects, they are
"environmental
a large scale, as some experts fear, the effects
beneficial to Russia. However, as enhance-
security" risks
on the human environment in the United
ments to U.S. national security, their value is
States will certainly be felt. The extent of the
decidedly less. At the same time, potentially
militarizing envi-
risk would need to be determined by serious
serious threats to the environment of the
ronmental issues
investigation and analysis, something that
United States are left unevaluated. The latter
has not yet been done, despite the flurry of
threats may or may not cross a reasonable
and trampling on
American activity elsewhere in Russia. For
threshold. But, until they are assessed against
civil liberties.
now, the head of Russia's nuclear inspec-
such a threshold, the question remains open.
torate has warned that the radioactive waste
Hard science is needed for hard decisions, and
buildup threatens "nuclear catastrophe on a
the security of the United States requires both.
global scale."9 8 Henry Kendall, a Nobel laure-
ate in physics at MIT, describes it as "the
Conclusion:
largest and most careless nuclear practice
that the human race has ever suffered."9 9 At
Whither Security?
the moment, however, it seems that the focus
is on pet projects, with little regard for how
Linking environmental degradation with
they might affect U.S. security, while more
national security sets a dangerous precedent
genuine potential threats to the United
in national security policy. In practice, the
States have been ignored. In a further exam
-
linkage has not gained considerable ground,
ple, Alexei Yablokov has pointed out that
if one compares the funding and attention it
Russian plans to build a series of floating
receives with that still dedicated to advancing
nuclear power plants stationed on towable
traditional military security goals. However,
barges have been wholly ignored by U.S. pol-
it is precisely because the concept of environ-
icymakers, despite the fact that the first
ment security has grown even as it has
plant, due to be installed at Pevek in eastern
remained in the background, and therefore
Siberia, will be almost as close to the United
less subject to public scrutiny, that it is so
States as will be the planned Cuban Juragua
worrying. Rhetoric may extend beyond prac-
nuclear plant, construction of which the
tical reality for the moment, but that situa-
United States is strongly contesting on the
tion need not last. Pursuing the abstract goal
basis that the reactor type is unsafe and is a
of "environmental security" risks militariz-
hazard to Florida and other eastern states.100
ing environmental issues and trampling on
civil liberties. It also pushes the United States
The Consequences of U.S. Environmental
into more and more scenarios of overseas
Involvement in Russia
intervention and conflict, frequently of its
own making.
Taken together, the lack of clarity about
Given that the concept is unlikelly to dis-
how the Russian environment affects U.S.
appear in the near future, what can be done
interests and the misdirected efforts to ame-
at least to contain its worst excesses? Three
liorate environmental conditions in Russia
initial actions should be undertaken:
cannot but encourage suspicions among
Russian military and political elites about U.S.
· Define
motives. If those suspicions generate serious
Environmental Security: More
resentment in the Russian populace,
attention should be paid to what
Washington's goal of cooperation may degen-
elected officials and bureaucrats
erate into tension and allegations of espi-
mean when they talk about environ-
onage. But the worst problem seems to be that
mental "threats" to national security.
no threshold has been set. At the moment,
What kind of environmental issues
19