Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
This property
flow under gravity or pressure, surface
feet of water. Any part of the rights conveyed
boundaries no longer delineate the quantita-
by those deeds could be bought, sold,
rights system
tive extent of the resource and no longer
assigned, or bequeathed by contracts separa-
could be applied
define exclusion. What is needed in these
ble from contracts for the transfer of real
to a common
cases is a property right defined in units of
property. Water deed transfers could be
the resource itself. This principle has already
recorded in county or water authority records
property lake or
been applied to cattle, parakeets, and dogs;
in the same manner as transfers of real prop-
ocean fishery in
but fish, water, and oil seem destined to take
erty. That would allow existing institutional
a little longer.
procedures that have stood the test of time to
which it is feasi-
In many cases, it is feasible to create deed-
be extended to water rights. Water deed
ble to estimate
ed rights to migratory resources. Consider,
prices would be freely negotiable to facilitate
the stock of fish
for example, the water supply for Tucson,
a continuous market in rights to draw on the
Arizona. The city is located in a basin con-
existing stock of water. All pumps would be
and meter the
taining a natural subsurface aquifer estimat-
metered on farms, ranches, mines, factories,
catch.
ed to hold 20 million to 40 million acre-feet
or municipalities, as is now the case for met-
of water. All of Tucson's water is pumped
ropolitan area residences. Each user would
from deep wells drilled into this aquifer.
receive a monthly bill for the cost of pump-
According to 1975 estimates, the natural
ing, distribution, and management (exclud-
recharge rate was 75,000 acre-feet per year
ing private well owners who bear this cost
and the consumption rate was about 225,000
directly) and a monthly bill denominated in
acre-feet per year.6 4 Anyone with a surface
fractions of an acre-foot of deed certificates
right to land has been free to drill into this
to be surrendered for all water consumed
water supply and start pumping. In addition
(including that taken from private wells).
to city and county water authority wells, indi-
Every few years, depending on cost, the
vidual residences; the University of Arizona;
recharge of water to the aquifer could be esti-
and surrounding farms, horse ranches, man-
mated, or perhaps the aquifer stock reesti-
ufacturers, and mining companies own pri-
mated, and the outstanding stock of deed
vate wells that pump from this common
certificates adjusted by a stock dividend to
water stock. Periodically, these wells have to
maintain equality between the stock of water
be deepened as the water level declines. The
and total claims on water. Alternatively, and
city and county water authorities charge only
perhaps more simply, one could adjust the
for the cost of drilling, pumping, distribut-
redemption exchange rate for deed certifi-
ing, and managing this water system. The
cates. For example, if after 10 years the
water itself is free.
aquifer had experienced an 11 percent
To establish property rights to ground
increase in inventory, then the redemption
water, we propose that the county issue water
charge would be reduced so that the con-
deed certificates for 30 million acre-feet of
sumption of 10 acre-feet of water would
water.65 Those deeds could be issued in pro-
require the surrender of only nine acre-feet of
deed certificates. In this way, the exchange
portion to the surface area held by landown-
rate between certificates and metered water
ers but with adjustments for land used for
use could be adjusted to balance the demand
residences, irrigated agriculture, mining, and
for and supply of water as an asset.
industry. If feasible, adjustments could be
This property rights system could also be
made in proportion to a base period rate of
applied to a common property lake or ocean
water consumption. The objective would be
fishery in which it is feasible to estimate the
to recognize squatters' rights to water, since
stock of fish and meter the catch. Fishermen
the price of land has already capitalized the
would own deeds to live fish, which would be
right to pump water freely.
surrendered as the fish were harvested, and
Deeds could be issued in convenient
would be free to use any technology (now
denominations of 1, 5, 10, or fractional acre-
19