Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Transit has produced a "significant
Senator Ron Wyden" and was inspired by
increase in public [i.e., activist] involve-
"the LUTRAQ project" launched by 1000
ment in the regional planning process."
Friends of Oregon. In LUTRAQ (which
stands for "Land Use Transportation Air
EPA's Region III (mid-Atlantic) has also
Quality"), 1000 Friends felt that Portland
been getting involved in transportation plan-
would be better off with less highway con-
ning "before key political decisions are
struction because the resulting congestion
might lead some people to drive a little less.3 7
made." The report notes that this prevents
the formation of a political constituency for
It appears likely that at least some section
highway projects: "Currently most environ-
1221 dollars will find their way to groups
mental reviews occur after projects have a
that lobby against highways.
political constituency behind them, making
change very difficult."
Fixing the Problem
One important fund created by ISTEA
and continued in TEA-21 is the $1 billion
annual Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality
In 1995, House bill H.R. 1130, the "Integrity
(CMAQ) fund. The administration has pro-
in Government Act," would have forbidden
EPA's Region III
posed increasing the size of the fund to $1.6
any "recipient of an award, grant, or contract
(mid-Atlantic) has
billion annually, arguing that the new money
from the Federal Government" from lobby-
should be spent on "air quality" (i.e., reduc-
ing or hiring others to lobby for the funding
been getting
ing automobile use) and not "congestion
of any program with the department or
involved in trans-
mitigation." For example, improved traffic
agency giving the grant. The bill did not
portation plan-
signals can reduce congestion, but the paper
make it out of committee.
suggests that such improvements should be
Other efforts to limit EPA grant making to
ning before key
ineligible for CMAQ funds because the
nonprofits have similarly failed. In 1996 one
political decisions
reduced congestion can "induce more overall
of the cosponsors of H.R. 1130, Rep. Ernest
travel."
Istook Jr. (R-Okla.), introduced a floor
are made.
To carry out these schemes, the report
amendment to the major appropriations
concludes by recommending that an addi-
bills that would "require any private organi-
tional 31.5 full-time equivalent staff, and
zations that receive a Federal grant to dis-
$3.15 million in support funds, be allocated
close their lobbying activities to the Agency
to EPA's TEA-21 campaign.
or Agencies which awarded the grant." As
On top of this, section 1221 of TEA-21
mild as this measure was, it passed the floor
authorizes the Department of Transpor-
of the House by only two votes (211 to 209).
tation to distribute $20 million per year to
Since EPA has no reason to oppose any lob-
local transportation agencies for studies of
bying done by its dependent groups, the mea-
local transportation problems.3 5 The law
sure has little effect.
Congressional investigations of "smart
specifically directs the department to consid-
growth" should examine the role of EPA in
er agencies that have "involvement with non-
promoting this anti-automobile, anti-suburb
traditional partners [i.e., nonprofit organiza-
agenda. Ultimately, Congress should forbid
tions] in the project." The department is also
EPA and the Department of Transportation
to give priority to projects in areas that have
from making grants to any organization that
adopted urban-growth boundaries and other
uses any of its resources to lobby Congress,
smart-growth policies.
state or local legislatures, or federal, state, or
A recent newsletter of the Surface
local agencies.
Transportation Policy Project urged local
Americans have a constitutional right to
groups to take advantage of this provision to
fund their anti-highway campaigns.3 6
choose where they live, where they go, and
how they get there. They also have a constitu-
Section 1221 "was sponsored by [Oregon]
12