Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Congress passed the 1998 transportation
percent per year since the 1920s, which was
bill, the Transportation Equity Act for the
well before any federal involvement in high-
ways.3 4Meanwhile, EPA's own data show that
21st Century (TEA-21), with the expectation
that it would significantly boost funding for
the environmental damage caused by this
highways. But EPA is mounting a major effort
driving is steadily declining as cleaner cars
to divert gas taxes and other highway user fees
and fuels replace older ones. The report erro-
away from highways to mass transit, trans-
neously claims that "vehicle-caused pollution
portation demand management, sprawl pre-
doubles periodically in most metropolitan
vention, and other dubious programs. The
areas." In fact it is declining in most areas.
Transportation Partners and Smart Growth
On the basis of that premise, however, the
Network play a major role in that effort.
report calls for EPA's "involvement in the
Traditionally, the federal government has
early stages of transportation plan develop-
provided funds for transportation but let
ment." Within each EPA region, says the
cities and states decide how to spend those
report, EPA will "work with MPOs
funds. The Intermodal Surface Transpor-
[Metropolitan Planning Organizations] and
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA)
other stakeholders to promote demand man-
expanded on that tradition by allowing cities
agement [i.e., reduced automobile use] and
EPA's own data
and states to spend more money earned from
other innovative alternatives" to highways.
show that the
federal highway user fees on transit or other
The report also calls for EPA to aggressively
nonhighway construction--but the ultimate
oppose "auto dependency and urban sprawl."
environmental
decision was still left up to the states.
TEA-21 provisions to streamline environ-
damage caused by
EPA plans to overturn that tradition, both
mental clearance--intended by Congress to
driving is steadily
by demanding that cities with air quality prob-
reduce the power of environmental regula-
lems spend transportation dollars according
tors to block road projects--are seen by EPA
declining as
to its whims and by encouraging local EPA
as "an opportunity to change the transporta-
cleaner cars and
officials and partners to intervene in local
tion planning process by building on our
transportation planning. Some sense of EPA's
involvement in plan development to ensure
fuels replace
goals can be obtained from an internal EPA
that demand management strategies with
older ones.
TEA-21 Workgroup Report that was approved
broad multimedia benefits are addressed at
by the agency's Office of Policy last September.
key points in the planning process."
The report, titled "New Approaches to
("Multimedia" is EPA jargon referring to air,
Integrate Environmental and Transportation
water, and land.) In other words, a "stream
-
Policy through TEA-21 Implementation,"
lined process" will have EPA and its allies
describes EPA's current role in local trans-
killing highway projects before anyone
portation decisions as "marginal" and pro-
knows they are being considered, thus
poses new interventions to give pro-environ-
"reducing the need for stakeholder involve-
ment officials, environmental activists, and
ment at later stages."
regulators--many of whom are EPA part-
The report applauds a number of local
ners--more power in transportation plan-
plans that meet EPA's approval:
ning at the local and regional levels. The "new
·In northwest Indiana, several highway
approach" will be to kill projects that increase
highway capacity early on rather than to
projects were eliminated "before project
allow municipal officials the right of having
selection," meaning before they could
the final say.
be fairly compared with EPA-preferred
The report states, "Current strategies are
alternatives.
·In Philadelphia, environmental indica-
leading to very rapid increases in driving and
sprawl with escalating environmental dam-
tors were established that bias the
age."3 3 In fact, the number of miles
analysis against roads.
· In San Francisco, a Regional Alliance for
Americans drive has increased at about 2 to 3
11