Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Table 10
Frequency of Asset Allocation Changes Allowed to Participants in 401(k)s (%)
Period
1990
1995
1997
Daily
8
38
61
Monthly
7
13
12
Quarterly
27
30
19
Semiannually
21
3
2
Annually
19
15
3
Other
18
1
3
Source: Profit Sharing/401(k) Council of America.
The best indica-
neers of worker capitalism had hoped. By
lies than noninvestors. The percentage of
tor of the grow-
margins of 48 to 6 percent, shareholders told
American adults who are wed is 59.7. The per-
Nasdaq researchers that they invested for
centage of married stockholders is 70.4
ing relevance of
according to a Rasmussen Research poll,4 9 71
"growth in value over time" rather than for
computers to the
"regular dividend income."47
according to ICI,5 0 and 82 according to the
New York Stock Exchange.5 1
consumer market
Two recent surveys invited investors to
identify the concerns that brought them to
These worker-owners' increasingly long-
for corporate
the market. The ICI poll of mutual-fund
term orientation has led them to question
shares is not in
shareholders reported these priorities: 84 per-
the wisdom of reliance on government sys-
cent invested for supplementary retirement
tems of social insurance. When EBRI in 1996
the sketchy con-
income, 26 percent to pay for education
asked workers to list sources of retirement
sumer data but in
expenses, 9 percent to supplement current
income they regarded as "major" or "most
the growth of
living expenses, and 7 percent to buy a home
important," Social Security barely beat out
or other real estate.4 8
postretirement employment. Sixty-one per-
Web services
cent listed work-based defined contribution
Investors interviewed by Peter D. Hart
among broker-
plans; 56 percent listed other personal sav-
Research Associates for Nasdaq listed similar
ings or investments; 50 percent listed money
priorities: 89 percent invested for retirement
ages.
an employer put in a pension plan; 26 per-
security, 28 percent to pay for a child's educa-
cent listed Social Security; and 25 percent
tion, 18 percent to afford major purchases
listed post-retirement work.
such as a new car, 13 percent to be able to
And they are doing something about the
support a parent or elderly relative, 10 per-
situation. From 1989 to 1995, the percentage
cent to start a business, 10 percent to buy a
of heads of households below age 35 who
home, and 5 percent to finance their own
owned stock increased 64 percent. "[P]eople
education.
aged 45 to 64 report that they first began to
The goal of contemporary investors, in
prepare for retirement at age 35," reported
short, is to finance the major expenses that
the PSCA, "while those aged 25 to 44 say that
can be expected to occur at discrete points
they first began to prepare at age 26."5 2
during a normal life cycle: for example, the
purchase of a home, a child's education, a
Poterba, Venti, and Wise present further
parent's medical bills, and, above all, retire-
evidence of the aggressive participation of the
ment. Investors are planning for their fami-
youngest cohort of investors in retirement
lies. And they are more likely to live in fami-
planning, as shown in Table 11.
17