Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
In addition
ly unused lending authority in the Central
done without threatening U.S. air superiori-
European Defense Loan fund, and the long
ty. The GAO estimates that with modest
to providing
history of bad loans for foreign arms sales all
upgrades, current-generation F-15s are more
grants and subsi-
suggest that the U.S. government should
than adequate to defeat any likely U.S. adver-
dized loans to
sary until at least 2014.21 Keeping existing air-
eliminate its exposure in arms export lend-
ing. U.S. taxpayers should ask why arms deal-
craft in the inventory instead of retiring them
U.S. weapons-
ers and foreign nations are being subsidized
prematurely would allow the Pentagon to
exporting firms,
to conduct arms transfers, some of which
slow down or cancel manufacture of the cost-
the Pentagon and
could cause regional conflicts or instability.
ly F-22 and F/A-18E/F fighters and concen-
In the interests of a sound foreign policy and
trate its resources on the next-generation
the State and
a sound fiscal policy, the era of "creative
Joint Strike Fighter. That approach could
Commerce
financing" and back-door, off-budget sup-
save tens of billions of dollars and would also
port for arms exports should be brought to
slow the pace of conventional weapons pro-
Departments pro-
an end.
liferation by reducing the stockpile of com-
vide extensive
bat fighters the Pentagon has for the world
Surplus and Leasing--The Pentagon's Weapons
marketing assis-
Giveaway Programs. In addition to financing
market.
arms exports through grants and loans, the
During FY97, under its Excess Defense
tance to those
Pentagon has also been leasing or giving away
Articles program, the Pentagon gave away
companies.
massive quantities of highly capable U.S.
military equipment with an original acquisi-
weapons that have been declared "surplus"
tion value of $973 million. Those giveaways
relative to current needs. According to a path-
went to 24 countries. The recipients of the
breaking report in 1996 by the Arms Sales
largest giveaways were Turkey ($271 million),
Monitoring Project of the Federation of
Jordan ($183 million), Greece ($100 million),
American Scientists, from 1990 to 1995 the
Morocco ($91 million), Israel ($68 million),
United States gave away (or sold at a steep
and Argentina ($66 million). Even allowing
discount) weaponry that had originally been
for depreciation, the Pentagon estimates the
purchased by the U.S. government for a total
current value of those weapons at $309 mil-
of $8.7 billion. Not only are those items being
lion. Given the Pentagon's well-documented
dumped on the market at much less than
history of underestimating the current value
their actual value, but, as the report states,
of surplus weapons, the true figure could be
"the services appear to be giving away still
25 to 50 percent higher. In addition to those
useful equipment to justify procurement of
grants of surplus weapons, the Pentagon sold
new weaponry." As a result, taxpayers end up
14 nations over $526 million worth of sur-
paying twice: once for forgone proceeds from
plus weapons at a steep discount (at prices
the sale to foreign nations of the still-useful
averaging 85 percent lower than the original
equipment and a second time for the pur-
acquisition value of the weapons). The recip-
chase of even costlier replacement items. For
ient of most of those discounted weapons
example, the Air Force and the Navy are buy-
was wealthy Australia, which received
ing expensive new fighter aircraft (the F-22
weapons originally worth $483 million for
and the F-18E/F, respectively) to counter the
roughly one-tenth of their original price.22
proliferation of advanced fighter aircraft
Another way the Pentagon unloads sur-
such as the U.S.-built F-15, F-16, and earlier
plus U.S. weaponry is through leasing
model F-18, some of which the armed ser-
arrangements. In FY97 the Pentagon leased
vices are now in the process of giving away as
to 13 countries equipment with an original
surplus.20
acquisition value of over $103.4 million. The
recipient of most of that weaponry was
A cheaper and smarter alternative would
Turkey, which received equipment originally
be to keep planes like the F-15, the F-16, and
valued at over $54 million for a rental price
the current model of the F-18 in service for
of $19.9 million.23
another decade or so, which could easily be
8