Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Table 1
U.S. Government Subsidies for Arms Exports, FY96
(annualized average, in millions of dollars)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Agency
Expenditure
Financing and Aid Programs
U.S. Department of Defense
Foreign military financing
3,317.8
Defense Export Loan Guarantee funda
16.7
Forgiven/bad loans
1,000.0
Excess defense articles/emergency drawdowns
750.0
No-cost leases of U.S. equipment
63.2
Repeal or waiver of recoupment fees
200.0
U.S. Agency for International Development: Economic Support Fundsb
2,042.3
Export-Import Bank Loansc
33.7
________
Subtotal
7,423.7
Promotional and Support Programs
U.S. Departments of Defense, State, and Commerce
Government personnel costs for promotion/supportd
410.0
Government support for air shows/weapons
34.2
______
Subtotal
444.2
Total: All U.S. government support for arms sales
7,867.9
More than half
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Sources: U.S. Departments of Defense, State, and Commerce; U.S. Export-Import Bank; U.S. Agency for
of U.S. arms sales
International Development; and the Congressional Budget Office. For further details on sources and methodology for
are now being
Table 1, see William D. Hartung, Welfare for Weapons Dealers 1998: The Hidden Costs of NATO Expansion (New
York: World Policy Institute, March 1998), www.worldpolicy.org.
financed by U.S.
a Subsidy value of loans guaranteed to date.
taxpayers--not by
b The figure cited represents only $2 billion of the $2.3 billion in Economic Support Funds for 1996. The remainder
foreign arms
of that aid was not an offset for the costs of weapons purchases by major buyers of U.S. arms, such as Egypt and
Israel.
clients.
c Represents the subsidy value.
d To support 6,300 personnel at the Pentagon and State and Commerce Departments.
in the form of taxpayer-backed loans, grants,
Turkey, Colombia, and the now-defunct
and promotional activities that help the con-
Mobutu regime in Zaire, could never have
tractors sell their wares to foreign customers.
afforded to buy costly armaments from U.S.
Many of those U.S. arms clients, such as
companies without U.S. government support.
4