Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Opponents of any
and the Hollow Force of the mid to late
under his command--to respond. Among the
1970s.
first groups to arrive in Korea on July 1st were
decrease in readi-
two companies (totaling 406 men) com-
ness cite two
manded by Lt. Col. Charles "Brad" Smith.
Task Force Smith
major
Those companies were only lightly armed
Reconsidered
with--besides their rifles and machine guns--
examples--Task
The Task Force Smith incident is impor-
four 75-mm recoilless rifles, four 4.2-inch
Force Smith in
tant for two reasons. First, it is cited--usually
mortars, four 60-mm mortars, and ten 2.36
the Korean War
by the Army--as one of the two major exam-
bazooka rocket launchers (which were con-
ples of the consequences of not being ready.
sidered obsolete and ineffective against
and the Hollow
Retired Army Colonel and syndicated mili-
tanks). In addition, a small battery of six 105-
Force of the
tary columnist Harry Summers has written
mm artillery (with 124 men) was assigned,
over a dozen commentaries on Task Force
but it had only six rounds of anti-tank
1970s.
Smith since the end of the Cold war.16 "No
ammunition. That small force of 540
Americans was gloriously labeled "Task Force
More Task Force Smiths" has become a
Smith." The local commander, Maj. Gen.
mantra for the Army. But Task Force Smith is
William F. Dean, sent them forward with
actually more important for another reason.
orders to simply show themselves. There was
The Task Force Smith response to the North
a feeling that the mere appearance of
Korean attack on South Korea is, in fact, the
American troops would stop the North
only strategic example in the history of the
Korean Peoples Army (NKPA).
United States where readiness--the ability of
Smith deployed his forces forward on July
forces to deploy quickly and perform initially
4th. But the 406 troops, backed up by a small
in wartime--was truly needed. There are
artillery battery, could only cover a limited
other examples of strategic sneak attacks--
front. The next day, Task Force Smith was
such as the one on Pearl Harbor--but no
confronted by an NKPA armored regiment
immediate  counterstrike  was  needed.
led by 33 T-34 tanks. Despite the lack of ade-
Because of the strategic invulnerability of the
quate anti-tank weapons, Task Force Smith
United States (resulting from the vast buffer
withstood the initial tank assault and
of the Pacific Ocean), the nation had the lux-
destroyed four tanks. During that armored
ury of taking time to build up forces while
assault, most of Smith's troops performed
conducting a slow island-hopping war
well. Although many of the inexperienced
against the Japanese. During wartime, there
artillerymen ran, the artillery officers and
are many tactical examples of surprise
noncommissioned officers stood their
attack--the most famous being the Battle of
ground. Task Force Smith was then attacked
the Bulge in World War II. But Korea is the
by the NKPA infantry and fought well for
only really bolt-out-of-the-blue strategic
almost seven hours. Finally outflanked and
attack that required an immediate tactical
afraid of being overrun, Smith ordered a
response. Therefore, a full analysis of all the
withdrawal. Here is where the trouble really
factors behind the rout of Task Force Smith
began. The troops were ordered to pull out
is important. However, before the analysis, a
with one company covering another, but one
brief description of what happened to Task
of the platoons failed to get the word. That
Force Smith is helpful.
platoon found itself isolated and the men
Background
simply "bugged out" with many leaving their
weapons behind.
North Korea invaded South Korea on
June 25, 1950. Almost immediately, on June
A Closer Look
27th, President Truman decided to intervene
While there is no question that the Task
and ordered Gen. Douglas MacArthur--then
Force Smith episode was not the U.S. Army's
stationed in Japan with four Army divisions
5