Page 19
Like today's advocates of
universal preschool, President
Johnson sold his program to
the public by promising that early
intervention could prevent
delinquency, poverty, and welfare
use. The reality of Head
Start has been much different.
As have model intervention programs, Head Start pro-
grams have had mixed short-term results.92 However, there
is no evidence of Head Start's having a positive, lasting
impact on children.93 The most recent and thorough analy-
sis of Head Start's impact was conducted in 1997 by the
General Accounting Office.94 After speaking with early
childhood researchers and practitioners and searching
through electronic databases to locate published and unpub-
lished manuscripts, GAO found nearly 600 citations and
documents. Of those, only 22 studies fit their criteria
for review and all of those "had some methodological prob-
lems."95 Not one study used a nationally representative
sample so that findings could be generalized to the
national program.96 The GAO concluded that "the body of
research on current Head Start is insufficient to draw
conclusions about the impact of the national program."97
Although the 1990 act that reauthorized Head Start funding
directed the Department of Health and Human Services to
conduct "a longitudinal study of the effects that the par-
ticipation in Head Start programs has on the development
of participants and their families and the manner in which
such effects are achieved," the Department of Health and
Human Services claims that funds were never appropriated
for the study; consequently, it has not been conducted.98
HHS maintains that early research has proven Head
Start's effectiveness. In a letter to the GAO, June Gibbs
Brown, inspector general of HHS, wrote, "There is clear
evidence of the positive impacts of Head Start services."99
For supporting evidence, HHS cited findings from a compre-
hensive synthesis of Head Start impact studies conducted
under its auspices in 1985.100 The study showed that Head
Start can have an immediate positive impact on cognitive
measures, social behavior, and child health, among other
things.101 HHS failed, however, to mention the rest of the
synthesis's findings, namely that the short-term impact of
Head Start quickly diminishes once the children enter
school. In fact, the synthesis concluded, "In the long
run, cognitive and socioemotional test scores of former
Head Start students do not remain superior to those of
disadvantaged children who did not attend Head Start."102
Regarding cognitive development measures--IQ scores,
school readiness, and achievement test scores--the report
concluded: