Page 17
children who will perform poorly in school, become teenage
parents, commit criminal acts, or depend on welfare.
Although some projects have had meaningful short-term
effects on disadvantaged children's cognitive ability,
grade retention, and special education placement, those
benefits are short-lived. At the same time, most inter-
ventions have concentrated on disadvantaged children, so
there is no evidence for universal replicability. In
fact, a large body of evidence shows that preschool can
have a negative impact on middle-income children.
Few studies have examined or demonstrated long-term
effects of intervention on children's development. Most
attempted studies were of model programs and were impaired
by small sample size, attrition, and selection bias and
were severely limited in statistical power and generaliz-
ability. The two projects that provide the most valid
estimates of the long-term effects of early intervention on
disadvantaged children--Perry Preschool and Abecedarian--do
not support the claims made by advocates of universal pre-
school. Finally, even if there were reliable evidence of
lasting, long-term effects of early intervention on disad-
vantaged children, it would still be necessary to show that
those effects could be generalized to a program of state or
national scope. As the following section details, the gov-
ernment's longest running preschool program for disadvan-
taged children, Head Start, has failed to produce long-term
benefits for participating children.
Head Start
Research on Head Start is relevant to the universal
preschool debate because the program has many characteris-
tics of a large-scale, public preschool program. Unlike
model programs, which typically have been small in scale
and conducted under ideal circumstances, Head Start is a
large-scale program operating under real-world conditions
and constraints. And unlike research on model programs,
which usually offers snapshots in place and time, research
on Head Start has been conducted across the country over a
33-year period. Furthermore, fundamental to the program's
philosophy is the notion that communities should have con-
siderable latitude to develop their own programs. That
variability is likely to be comparable to the variability
one would find among public preschools within school dis-
tricts and across states.
Ron Haskins, administrative director of the
Abecedarian Project from 1977 to 1980 and now staff direc-
tor of the Human Resources Subcommittee of the House Ways