Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Page 14
tion: "Policymakers should not assume that the widespread
enrollment of low-income children and families in early
childhood programs will enable children living in poverty
to perform later in school and life at the levels reached
by more advantaged [mainstream] children."68
Finally, Perry differed significantly from regular
preschool programs or what we could expect to see in uni-
versal preschool programs.  According to Zigler, "It is
very unlikely that a preschool program mounted in the typ-
ical public school will be of the quality represented by
the Perry Preschool Project."69   Large-scale programs tend
to have smaller effects than model programs, in part
because model programs have smaller classes, more educated
and enthusiastic staff, more staff members, and more
attention and supervision per child.70
The Carolina Abecedarian Project
The Abecedarian Project was launched in 1972 by
researchers at the Frank Porter Graham Child Development
Center in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.  The project
involved 111 children deemed at risk on the basis of their
parents' income, education, and other factors.  The mean
age at entry was 4.4 months.  The infants were placed in
an eight-hour-a-day, five-day-per-week, year-round educa-
tional daycare center.  They received free medical care,
dietary supplements, and social service support for their
families.71  From ages five through eight, half of the
children from both the experimental and the control groups
were given extra help in school and at home by specially
trained teachers.72
At every age from one and a half to four and a half
years, children treated in preschool significantly
outscored the control group on measures of intellectual
development.73   At age eight, test data showed significant
positive effects of preschool treatment on intellectual
test scores.74   A follow-up test at age 12 showed that the
effects of preschool treatment on children's performance on
intellectual tests and on reading and mathematics tests
had been maintained into early adolescence.  As the
Abecedarian Project researchers note, "This represented a
longer maintenance of preschool intervention gains than has
typically been reported from previous projects concerned
with similar children and families."75
Most recently, researchers examined the children's
intellectual and academic performance at age 15 and found
that students who had received preschool treatment scored