<<  <  >  >>

Page 25

24. Branigin, "INS Chief Highlights Reform in Political

Asylum System."

25. IIRIRA, sec. 604, amending 8 U.S.C., sec. 1158.  The

amendments also prohibit the grant of asylum to any appli-

cant who can be returned, pursuant to a bilateral or multi-

lateral agreement, to a country (other than the country of

nationality) in which the alien's life or freedom would not

be threatened and in which that person would have access to

asylum or equivalent temporary protection, unless it is in

the public interest for him or her to receive asylum in the

United States.  Although that provision is currently inap-

plicable because the United States presently has no such

agreements with other countries, for several months in 1996

the U.S. government had been negotiating with Canada regard-

ing an agreement about the treatment of aliens who travel

through one country to another.  The grant of asylum after a

previous asylum application has been denied has also been

prohibited, subject to changed and extraordinary circum-

stances.

26. The required documents are a valid visa or other speci-

fied document authorizing entry and a valid passport or

other suitable travel document.  See INA, secs. 212(a) (7),

235(b) (1) (A) (I), as amended.

27. See INA, secs. 212(a) (6) (C), 235(b) (1) (A) (I), as

amended.  The attorney general also has discretion (but has

chosen for the time being not to exercise it) to apply the

expedited removal procedures to "any and all" people already

in the United States who are accused of having entered the

United States without inspection and who cannot prove that

they have been physically present in the United States

continuously for two years immediately before the determi-

nation of inadmissibility.  See INA, sec. 235(b) (1) (A)

(3), as amended.

28. See INA, sec. 235(b) (1) (A) (ii), as amended.

29. Judicial review of this process is extremely limited.

In most cases, the courts are barred from reviewing the

individual determinations of asylum officers or of the

immigration judges who review their credible fear determina-

tions.  In addition, IIRIRA expressly prohibits courts from

granting any injunction, declaratory or other equitable

relief, or from certifying a class for a class action law

suit.  See INA, secs. 242(a) (2) (A), 242(e), as amended.

Judicial review is limited to only three issues: whether the