Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Page 3
Americans know and are concerned that governments
around the world oppress their citizens.  We condemn the
persecution of Christians and other religious minorities in
Sudan, Cuba, China, Pakistan, North Korea, and countries
that were part of the Soviet Union.  We criticize the Peo-
ple's Republic of China's systematic repression of religious
practices and study by the Tibetan and Uigher peoples.  We
cringe when we see the suffering of women and children
refugees in Somalia and Rwanda, the mass graves in Bosnia,
and the persecution of the Kurds in Iraq.  We are outraged
by the Chinese government's silencing of the student democ-
racy movement in Tiananmen Square and the forced abortion
and sterilization of Chinese people who want more than one
child.  And we denounce the practice of genital mutilation
of young girls in Africa and the Middle East.  We see images
of human suffering on the evening news, read about the
horrors of human rights abuses daily in newspapers, and
wonder how all that could be happening and what we could do
to help.
Yet, despite our commitment to encouraging basic free-
doms of speech, political opinion, and religion, IIRIRA has
imposed restrictions on the ability of victims of such human
rights abuses to escape government-sanctioned oppression and
persecution and to seek refuge in the United States.
Refugee Protection and Asylum Law
The U.S. government offers protection to those fleeing
persecution under two basic sets of laws--refugee law and
asylum law.  Modern protection policies were incorporated
into international treaties following the Nazi persecution
of Jews during World War II.  Current U.S. asylum law de-
rives from two of those treaties, the 1951 United Nations
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and the con-
vention's 1967 protocol.  The convention and the protocol
recognize states' obligation to provide protection to refu-
gees--individuals who, "owing to a well-founded fear of
being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group or political opin-
ion," are outside the country of their nationality and are
"unable or, owing to such fear, unwilling to avail them-
selves of the protection of their home countries.2  The
treaties' most basic requirement is commonly referred to as
nonrefoulment, the duty not to return a refugee to a country
in which his or her life will be threatened.