Stricter education
apists to have a master's degree.24 The Ameri-
State Medical Boards established a Special
can Association of Colleges of Nursing wants
Committee on Scope of Practice noting that
requirements
states to require a Doctor of Nursing Practice
"scope-of-practice changes are among the
limit entry into
degree of all new advance practice nurses by
most highly charged policy issues facing state
2015.25 A new law requires physician assistants
legislators and health care regulators."29
the medical
The American Medical Association has
to have a masters or higher degree to practice in
professions,
Ohio.26 Every state has required a master's
joined with other physician organizations
increase prices,
degree of occupational therapists since 2007.27
(including state-level medical associations) to
Starting in 2012, California will require new
establish the Scope of Practice Partnership, an
and reduce access
audiologists to have obtained a doctorate
"organized medicine coalition" to monitor leg-
to care, which can
(Au.D.), raising concerns that the legislation
islative efforts by other associations of health
result in worse
professionals.30 The president of the American
would exacerbate a shortage of audiologists.
Medical Association, Ronald M. Davis, called
The legislation followed a move by the Ameri-
health outcomes.
the Scope of Practice Partnership a "watchdog
can Speech-Language-Hearing Association, the
of legislative, regulatory, and legal endeavors
organization that accredits college audiology
that seek to expand the scope of practice of
programs, to require a doctorate for profession-
non-physician providers into the practice of
al certification. Questioning both why Califor-
medicine."31
nia legislators rushed to comply and whether
To counter efforts by organized medicine
even a master's degree is necessary to test some-
and the AMA's Scope of Practice Partnership
one's hearing, the Sacramento Bee called the
in particular, a group of 34 organizations rep-
requirement for a doctorate an "extraordinary
and costly mandate."28
resenting other licensed medical professionals
formed the Coalition for Patients' Rights.32
Ostensibly, increasing education require-
Acknowledging the difficulties in reviewing
ments would improve quality. But the relation-
scope-of-practice proposals and determining
ship between educational inputs and better
appropriate scopes of practice for various pro-
health outcomes is not that straightforward.
fessionals, several states have established legisla-
Stricter education requirements limit entry
tive committees to study scope-of-practice pro-
into the medical professions, increase prices,
posals and make recommendations. Statutes in
and reduce access to care, which can result in
Arizona and Iowa address the scope-of-practice
worse health outcomes.
review process. Arizona's statute requires con-
As with the audiology legislation in
sideration of the reason increased scope of prac-
California, it is not clear that those excluded
tice is sought, the impact on consumers' access
by these higher barriers to entry would not be
to health care, and implications for the inter-
competent practitioners. When hiring, hospi-
state migration of health care professionals.33 In
tals and other employers can and do specify
Virginia, the Board of Health Professions (with
the level of education or training required of
members from each of the 13 health regulatory
clinicians. Not every job requires the same
boards in the state) evaluates regulatory pro-
level of skills. Increasingly strict education
posals and recommends the appropriate level of
requirements deprive health care providers of
regulation.34 A Texas proposal (HB 3950) to
a range of education and training options
establish a Health Professions Scope of Practice
from which to choose. Forcing providers to
Review Commission failed in 2007.
use more highly educated--and thus more
In most cases, physicians (represented by
costly--practitioners increases prices and lim-
the state medical association) are in one cor-
its access to care.
ner and organizations representing other
clinicians are in the other.35 But non-physi-
Scope-of-Practice Turf Wars
cian clinicians also step on each other's toes.
Debates among competing groups of clin-
For example, because of a strong nursing lob-
icians over scopes of practice are increasingly
by that opposed the practice of physician
common. In July 2003, the Federation of
5