patients could be treated or the hospital would
lems, and few serious national health care
lose a portion of its funding.238 As the Daily
advocates look to it as a model. Yet it appears
in Moore's movie SiCKO as an example of
Telegraph explained:
how a national health care system should
work, so it is worth examining.
In a real competitive market, increased
The NHS is a highly centralized version of
demand can allow prices to rise, thus
a single-payer system. The government pays
increasing profits, which allow the mar-
directly for health care and finances the sys-
ket to grow. Efficient producers can then
tem through general tax revenues. Except for
reduce their unit costs and their prices,
small copayments for prescription drugs,
and so give a better deal to the con-
dental care, and optician services, there are
sumer. The prevailing logic is that the
no direct charges to patients. Unlike many
more customers who are served--or
other single-payer systems such as those in
products that are sold--in a given period
Canada and Norway, most physicians and
of time, the better the business does.
nurses are government employees.
But PCTs have budgets that are
For years, British health policy has focused
predetermined by Whitehall spend-
on controlling spending and in general has
ing limits, and there is no way for
been quite successful, with the system spend-
them to conjure extra revenue out of
ing just 7.5 percent of GDP on health care.232
the air or to grow their market. As a
result, the hospitals that are most
Yet the system continues to face serious finan-
successful in providing prompt treat-
cial strains. In fiscal year 2006, the NHS faced
ment are running through the finite
a deficit of £700 million, according to govern-
resources of their PCTs at an unac-
ment figures, and as much as £1 billion,
according to outside observers.233 This comes
ceptably rapid rate.239
despite a £43 billion increase in the NHS
annual budget over the past five years.234 By
The problem affects not only hospitals.
some estimates, NHS spending will have to
There are also lengthy waits to see physicians,
nearly triple by 2025 just to maintain the cur-
particularly specialists. In 2004, as a cost-cut-
rent level of services.235
ting measure, the government negotiated low
salaries for general practitioners in exchange
And that level of services leaves much to be
for allowing them to cut back the hours they
desired. Waiting lists are a major problem. As
practice. Few are now available nights or
many as 750,000 Britons are currently awaiting
weekends.240 Problems with specialists are
admission to NHS hospitals. These waits are
not insubstantial and can impose significant
even more acute. For example, roughly 40
risks on patients. For example, by some esti-
percent of cancer patients never get to see an
oncology specialist.241
mates, cancer patients can wait as long as eight
Explicit rationing
months for treatment.236 Delays in receiving
The government's official target for diag-
also exists for
treatment are often so long that nearly 20 per-
nostic testing is a wait of no more than 18
cent of colon cancer patients considered treat-
weeks by 2008. In reality, it doesn't come
some types of
close.242 The latest estimates suggest that for
able when first diagnosed are incurable by the
care, notably
time treatment is finally offered.237
most specialties, only 30 to 50 percent of
kidney dialysis,
patients are treated within 18 weeks. For trau-
In some cases, to prevent hospitals from
ma and orthopedics patients, the figure is only
using their resources too quickly, mandatory
open heart
20 percent. Overall, more than half of British
minimum waiting times have been imposed.
surgery, and some
patients wait more than 18 weeks for care.243
The fear is that patients will flock to the most
other expensive
efficient hospitals or those with smaller back-
Explicit rationing also exists for some
logs. Thus a top-flight hospital like Suffolk
types of care, notably kidney dialysis, open
procedures and
East PCT was ordered to impose a minimum
heart surgery, and some other expensive pro-
technologies.
cedures and technologies.244 Patients judged
waiting time of at least 122 days before
24